As I sit here observing what's going on as we approach the First Major Cataclysms, (that would be the New Madrid Adjustment and it's consequent European Tsunami as I've discussed here so often), I glance over to see the headlines that 40 out of 49 satellites sent up by Citizen Musk just got shot out of the stratosphere by an armada of magnetic particles. Hmmm, imagine that. What a failure rate! At the same time, after a day in an unexpected balmy 52°, there's snow flurries and the temperature dropped over 40°, tomorrow rising only to above freezing, but the next day a bounce back another 30°. As a planet, we're getting seasick of this wobble as the sloshing of the Gulf of Mexico from Texas to Florida and back is dizzying.
Monday, February 14, 2022
Visualizing the Unthinkable First Cataclysms
Sunday, February 6, 2022
From News-Nibblers to Not-see's to.....Zombies
Recently it occurred to me just exactly WHY there is an additional step forward from the Nazis that News Nibblers turn into, once their cognitively-lazy carelessness about being curious about the world around them takes root. Within a very rapid and short span of time, the dangers that News Nibblers represent to more rational thinkers became painfully obvious as the genocidal Jab was presented as so urgently needed by everyone, when the actual science tells us otherwise. Thus, this was a planned event and not merely as is so often presented, which is bureaucratic incompetence, and mistake-prone haste. Heretofore they've managed to get their past deadly plots over on the average clueless American because of our trusting nature. As much as we railed against authority ever since the boomers came on the scene, the fact is that it is the anti-authoritarians that have become the authoritarians. Orwellian to the max. Truth=Lies, War=Peace, Anti-racism=Racism.
Thursday, March 25, 2021
The Ides (And Ideas) Of March & The Hand Of Fate
Tuesday, July 28, 2020
The Lies Of 'White Guilt' and 'Reparations'
The common argument against even holding such discussions (referring to reparations and 'white guilt') usually comes down to the fact that no one alive today was a slave or a slave owner. The real racism that was nakedly exposed in the 1960s has gradually been extinguished, in large part thanks to the civil rights laws of the period. (It should be noted that those laws were supported primarily by liberal and moderate Republicans, even more so than the Democrats of the time who, if they supported them at all, did so with the hoarse whisper of LBJ ringing in their ears -- "We'll have those n______ voting for us for the next 40 years".)
While that is certainly true and is sufficient not to reopen the ugly wounds of that time, there is indeed another argument against having this debate the way it has been narrated by the propaganda organs of the globalists (and the C.C.P.), who keep pushing it. I am speaking now of the concept of reincarnation and how it applies to the situation.
If one is accepting of the basic notion of reincarnation (and we recognize this is not a universally-accepted belief), then it is plain that a slave of yesteryear may reincarnate as a privileged white liberal of today, as reincarnation is supposedly based on the premise that every soul must go through as many lifetimes and different challenges as possible before graduating to a higher density. (To some this may mean "heaven".) Obversely, a slave owner of yesteryear may reincarnate as a young and poor black man of today. Thus, many poor black males clamouring for reparations today could very well be the reincarnations of slave owners from a previous era. The same souls that exploited others in a previous lifetime may not have matured after their former death, and are attempting to exploit the Achille's heel of insulated and affluent white people today.
What we do know today is that we are seeing an attempt, more AstroTurf than grass-roots, to foster a new generation of racism that could become uglier than the original. The more the mainstream propaganda outlets are allowed to continue a conversation that is blatantly racist against white people, the more racism they will stir up and thus divide the people against each other so that they will not unite against the much smaller group that has been exploiting and manipulating them for millennia.
What we now have is a result is a group of people within the majority who are susceptible to being guilt-tripped. These people, who are easily manipulated by their heart-strings, are especially susceptible because it does not take a physicist to determine that there are large numbers of people that have little or nothing in the way of material affluence and resources while around them are (seemingly vast) suburban pockets of prosperity.
While the above facts are true, they can be connected poorly without understanding that middle-class affluence has been dying over the decades since World War II. Those 'suburban pockets' should be much more numerous and larger, and the poverty that surrounds them should be much smaller. The racial composition of the disparity is also misleading, if only due to the fact that America is still a majority-Caucasian nation, a fact that is nothing to be ashamed about. The proportion of African-Americans to the nation as a whole is still less than 15%. Ironically, the composition of the entertainment class, whether music or sports or fashion, is largely African-American, particularly in popular music (I'm speaking of the most popular forms today, commonly known as rap and hip-hop) and football, the most popular sport. In fact, African-Americans enjoy an overwhelming majority in the celebrity classes, even as they suffer an overwhelming majority in the penalized demographics (i.e. the prison population).
What is occurring with these nonsensical and divisive ideas of 'reparations' and 'white guilt' is an attempt to further weaken the unifying concept of what America represents. It is an attempt to prevent Donald Trump from being re-elected as the American president, because the forces attempting to unseat him had not foreseen his arrival and subsequent overturning of their vaunted New World Odor (er, Order) in 2016 and who has now taken many of them into custody and has prevented them from carrying out their genocidal plans for the End Times. Their use of guilt-tripping is not new; the entire agenda of blaming Earth changes on the carbon footprint of man was also a means of guilt-tripping the majority. Once it was discovered that the Al Gore family household had not changed a single incandescent bulb to the more energy-efficient and carbonless LED lights he was promoting in the limelight, his hypocrisy was exposed and the entire argument for carbon tax credits was undercut and shown to be a fraud.
The astute observer will recognize that this is not a mere blip in the patterns of history, but a maneuver by the elites to maintain control by further eroding our liberties under the guise of racial inequities, which they caused in the first place (and every place since). The point cannot be made more clearly: aggressively and firmly refute the false narrative that people are born racist because of the color of their skin. That is actually the most racist claim of all, and it is being made by those who claim they are against racism. Like much of the rest of the rhetoric of the now-deranged Left, it projects their own guilty past onto their opponents.
Take pride in your culture, whatever it is and wherever it is from, and stand up to the false narratives in the Establishment media. We have much bigger tasks ahead.
Sunday, May 12, 2019
In Defense Of The Golden Rule

"Whether I brought it everyone attention and re-using the article including my name in your tweet is two different things, you didn't check with me to see if it OK and I didn't give permission. You already have the article reposted without my name"

Tuesday, February 26, 2019
"A Nation That is Afraid To Let its People Judge the Truth and Falsehood in an Open Market is a Nation That is Afraid Of Its People"
How Politico and Brett Horvath Are Fraudulently Forcing Twitter to Deprive Americans Of Their Free Speech
Using the psychological technique of 'projection' to justify censorship of all voices not aligned with the progressive narrative, Brett Horvath has propelled his latest fraud to the forefront of illogic. With the imprimatur of Establishment media giant Politico behind him, his "Guardians.ai" corporate entity has produced a fraudulent study used to force Twitter to remove 200 of the most influential patriot voices on its platform.
While this scandal in its entirety is both broad and deep, the specific feature under discussion as it relates to censorship involves the case study cited by Politico's reporter Natasha Korecki on Feb 20, 2019 titled
‘Sustained and ongoing’ disinformation assault targets Dem presidential candidates
The headline suggests that there is an organized campaign of some sort, with a nefarious agenda, to "disinform" the public, or at least what is presumed to be a malleable and impressionable segment of it. Immediately we see the projection behind this claim because the only source we have for anything acknowledged to be of a similar nature in the 2017--2018 midterm campaign are the now-verified claims that Democrats created artificial Russian bots used to draw negative attention to Republican senatorial candidate Roy Moore. Furthermore, Clinton campaign accusations that the Trump campaign colluded with Russians against them in 2016 have proven to be unfounded even after more than 2 years of investigation by special counsel Robert Mueller. Additionally, their claims that the Russians interfered with the election by hacking both Clinton campaign emails and DNC emails have also been proven to be unfounded, while evidence mounts that they [Hillary Clinton and Democratic party loyalists] have been behind the assassination of the disaffected Democrat who really was the party behind the leaks (as opposed to "hacks"; certifiable evidence is now in the public record that shows these were definitely not hacks). Furthermore, and we all need to press for an answer here, the stunning revelations rampant throughout those emails have never been adequately addressed by DNC officials, let alone the candidate herself.
The tipping point in this Orwellian dystopia we now seem to be living through has been the exposure of the Jussie Smollett Hate-Crime Hoax, and to a lesser extent it's predecessor, the Covington High School students vs Nathan Philip, the Native American activist. Both were attempts by Democratic operatives to create racial tension and conflict artificially, with corporate cameras standing by to capture the [non-existent] "far-right hatred and violence" the Establishment has desperately been trying to prove, as an excuse to clamp down on the patriot movement that represents an existential threat to them.
The sad truth is that the only groups attempting to sow discord and employing bots to do so via a "disinformation campaign" are groups such as Brett Horvath's Guardians.ai and the embryonic Democratic campaigns of several announced presidential contenders. The list of 200 individuals that have been removed from Twitter after pressure was put on them by citing this fraudulent study are actually organically-driven patriots, ordinary Americans who were not paid to share their opinions but did so freely of their own will, but who's large followings threatened the validity of messages of the large corporate campaigns.
Explosive but thoroughly detailed developments now being revealed by independent researcher Tracy Beanz, who has posted her findings at her Twitter feed @tracybeanz certify that the prime source used by Politico, the case study assembled by CEO Brett Horvath of Guardians.ai is in fact flawed and an outright fraud. The very first claim, that this study followed the search term "voter fraud" and some vaguely sinister campaign centering around that term for 3 years because they are somehow threatening, is faulty by definition. The claims that there is a "sophisticated network" is true; the entities involved are citizen journalists and many have a knack for appearing on video, each being an independent perspective on particular areas of interest. The claim is that there is something new to this, something to fear, and that this network is intentionally selling disinformation in large quantities to innocent and unsuspecting blocks of voters.
And now they have taken to banking. In recent developments, it appears that Chase Bank is now evicting account-holders supporting President Trump, particularly luminaries in the patriot movement. According to PJ Media, and confirmed by the correspondence, Chase Bank has ejected Laura Loomer, Enrique Tarrio (the Afro-Cuban chairman of the Proud Boys fraternal organization), Joe Biggs (of InfoWars fame), Martina Markota (Lady Alchemy creator, Rebel Media personality and performance artist), and presumably more individuals that haven't the access and attention to the alternative media, are losing access to the banking system that allows them to conduct their life and handle their responsibilities. Think of that. This could happen to you, and all because your electronic trail follows non-conformist political views! As a result of you not believing in late-term abortion, your debit card could be canceled and you couldn't even put gas in your tank despite having title to an amount of money the bank is holding for you (and using for its consolidated balance sheet).
Did that sink in yet? If so, have you thought ahead to realize that we can't do anything physically violent in reaction to this attempt to terminate our voices on social media -- Enrique Tarrio for one has been terminated by not only Chase Bank but Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and a few others including PayPal simply because he holds the power of an organization that was formed to counter the left-wing violence of Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and generally any Trump-hating organization.
The 'Interested Few' in the public that have the ability should take to task the following defendants that are attempting to place controls on our free speech: first, Natasha Korecki, the Politico reporter who penned the misleading article titled " ‘Sustained and ongoing’ disinformation assault targets Dem presidential candidates" , and who should be sued for libel while being reminded that WE the People who would be subject to having our internet access limited, have the right to choose for ourselves what sources of information we wish to assimilate to. Next, Brett Horvath, who assembled the misleading 'study' cited by Korecki; he is also guilty of libel as well as insulting the intelligence of the average voter by assuming they don't have the critical thinking skills to separate good news from fake news, which is another example of the paradoxical nature of the claims he makes in his study.
It can happen to you, it's happening to some already, and someone with the right 'access' needs to sound this alarm. Please help and pass it along.
Links to data contained in this article:
https://threadreaderapp.com/user/tracybeanz
https://medium.com/@bretthorvath/late-surge-in-disinformation-for-voterfraud-electionfraud-and-calls-to-violence-f1e8e3b8258
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/02/20/2020-candidates-social-media-attack-1176018
https://pjmedia.com/trending/time-for-action-chase-bank-denies-service-to-conservatives/
https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/02/21/chase-bank-shuts-down-lady-alchemy-creator-and-trump-supporter-martina-markotas-bank-account/
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/chase-bank-shuts-down-proud-boys-leaders-personal-bank-account/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hI0SNCLaO8
NEVER FORGET these immortal words of Pres. John F. Kennedy, spoken to the Voice of America on the occasion of its 20th Anniversary, this same day in 1962 - February 26th:
"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."