Sunday, November 13, 2016

Election 2016 - Right VS Wrong, not Right VS Left

The Existential Threat Posed By Hillary Rodham Clinton

As the reality of President-Elect Donald Trump sinks in, with the violent temper tantrums by the Soros-funded gangs still sputtering off in the distance, it may seem to many of us that “happy days are here again”, and indeed they are, but America narrowly dodged an existential threat. Few of Hillary Clinton's supporters took the time to actually read the Wikileaks' “Podesta Emails”, but if they had, they would know by now that they were supporting a satanic demon-worshipping witch, yes an actual witch, and her inner-most circle of staff of a similar bent. No, this wasn't something to be casually scoffed at as so much “new-age curiosity”, but was rooted in the most depraved pedophilia that included child sacrifice as well as rape and all manner of perversity.

The Popular American Nationalist

Donald Trump is not, and never was, a traditional Republican. It's for that reason that he was resisted by the Establishment, both the GOP Establishment as well as the Democratic Establishment and practically the entire mainstream corporate media Establishment. The Bush family moved their allegiances to Hillary, and this was barely mentioned in footnotes here and there whereas had this happened before, it would have alienated a substantial chunk of the Democratic base. When that happened, it should have dawned on most voters with half a brain that the real lines of conflict were NOT between the values of a leftist party that normally champions diversity, justice for the disenfranchised, care for the least fortunate, concern for the ecology of the environment, etc, and the values of a right-wing party that normally champions individual ambition, security, business, fewer taxes and regulations, etc. Instead, the electorate was faced with a candidate who was probably the most untrustworthy in modern memory and slowly being exposed as a morally-hollow poster child for corruption, who based her policy positions on whatever her focus groups told her......entrenched in the Establishment and set against an opponent who had been an avowed enemy of globalization for decades, who had never held elected office or who had been an officer in the military yet who seemed to have his finger on the exact pulse of the electorate.  This businessman went on to clean the clocks of well-established rivals who had been governors and senators; his claim to fame was building skyscrapers, resorts, casinos, and who had starred in his own reality TV show.  Shades of Ronald Reagan, made to order for the Orwellian Double-Speak world of the second decade of the 21st century.  The 'Giant Cheet-O', or 'Yuge Yam' as some detractors called him, seemed perfectly scripted, as he already owned an aircraft -- "Hair Force One" -- that could be compared to Air Force One, a matching helicopter that could be compared to Marine One, who filled his rallies with rock n' roll from the 60s, 70s, and 80s that reflected the mood of the audience, and his speeches left little room for the stale politics of your grandfather's GOP. His demeanor was determined, a bit rough around the edges with surly tinges of bellicosity, but his genuine concern for the country and his innate honesty was communicated nonetheless.

Globalization, Globalism, & Evil Globalists

The new political conflict is between the populist form of 'Americanism' vs 'globalism' that is the invention of the 1% of the elite that has controlled both the movement of political forces and their definitions, through their ownership and control of the mass media they use to mold public opinion and passions. The public made their choice known, and the scale of the tsunami would have been much greater except for the fact so much of the smug 'intelligentsia' in the urbs and sub-urbs had been so inundated by an onslaught of anti-Trump propaganda. There were teams of reporters and researchers digging frantically for novel bombshells that would somehow expose the anti-globalist Trump as even more of an ogre than they thought they had painted him as. And, they actually were arrogant enough to think they had succeeded.

The Discrediting of Corporate Broadcast & Print Media

Imagine! This corporate media had become a public-relations conglomerate of Hillary lackeys, as Wikileaks amply demonstrated in daily leaks, and were so out of touch with the average American they had no clue whatsoever that all they did – through their constant lies and genuflection – was alienate their viewers even further (if Alex Jones and InfoWars is correct, they – CNN, MSNBC, and even Fox to some degree, lost over 90% of their audience this year, including this writer). I couldn't stand to listen to the voice of Hillary once it became clear her team was stealing state after state for her away from Sanders, who was the overwhelming choice of the majority of Democrats. The voice of a thief, an evil thief who was actually an impostor both as thinking of herself as the actual choice of most of the rank-and-file of Democrats, and for her corruption in having a “public position” for the voters to hear, and a “private position” for the bankers and elitists whose bidding she was sure to do. And even when she wasn't speaking, having to hear the pundits on CNN and MSNBC speak constantly of her and her qualifications, coupled with negative coverage of Trump, was simply too much for my brain to have to bear, even as part of the background noise. The only time I see what goes on the CNN and MSNBC sets is when I watch clips filtered through the new “alt.media”, who help break down what the hidden agenda might be in that particular instance. These days we get our CNN through people like Gary Franchi and MLordAndGod, AmTV, H.A. Goodman and of course Alex Jones.

The history of this election will be replete with daily bombshells from Wikileaks, and it could be said that Wikileaks and the InfoWars operation run by Alex Jones fueled the Trump movement and was there to welcome the average TV viewer tired of hearing the outright lies by the corporate media. This took place not only on laptop and desktop screens, but the new Roku, Chromecast, and “smart” TVs that allow viewers to 'cut the cord' to their cable boxes, many of which lie disused and gathering dust as the audience has migrated to YouTube and various other platforms they can access on their smartphones, which are in large part replacing computers (excepting those who consider themselves creative, who need the larger capabilities a laptop or desktop offers).

Almost all of the alt.media that appear on YouTube autoplay queues have begun to adhere to the concept of 'globalization' as Public Enemy #1, whether alt.right or alt.left. The product of the annual Bilderberg meetings, G20 and G8 summits and other institutional efforts, globalization has come to represent the loss of jobs and even civil liberties in the US, and the Republican candidate limited himself almost exclusively to attacking the Democratic candidate on many of the same issues her Democratic challenger had attacked her on – issues involved with the concentration of wealth, the power of that wealth on the political process, and how certain wealthy individuals, such as George Soros, were pushing an agenda of open borders, unrestricted refugee flows, and the now-dead trade deal TPP and its Atlantic forerunner TTIP.

The antidote to this globalization process first came to widespread attention with the victory of the Brexit movement (Britain Exit – exit from the European Union) which totally confounded the corporate media. The leader of that movement, Nigel Farage, went on to advise Trump and that effort laid the groundwork for the populist movement that Trump rode to sweep 16 competitors into the dustbin with little effort. Those competitors seemed to have completely missed the message of Brexit, missed the effect of the alt.media and its centerpiece, Alex Jones' InfoWars, missed the growing awareness of the corruption at the heart of the DNC and the Clinton campaign, missed the growing disgust of “identity politics” that sparked a backlash in the wake of the Ferguson riots when it became apparent that the central figure whose shooting caused the rioting turned out to be a petty thief.

It may yet turn out that George Soros paid Michael Brown or otherwise caused him to be enticed into flouting the rule of law to openly steal a box of cigars from a convenience store, to openly walk down the middle of the street instead of using the sidewalk, and to threaten the police officer that confronted him about it with violence. Darren Wilson, the cop who shot him, went on to be exonerated and became a poster-child for “Blue Lives Matter”, the backlash to the “Black Lives Matter” (Soros-funded, along with the violence staged at a Chicago Trump rally) and ITS poster-child Michael Brown.

How "Identity Politics" Helped Fuel "Demexit" (The Exit of Democrats from the Party)

People, it turns out, are largely sick of “identity politics”. The “Black Lives Matter” movement only serves to further polarize society along racial lines. Of COURSE black lives matter. Who are you gonna inform that doesn't know this? The racist cops? Soros wants black people to buy into this polarization, to riot against “whitey”, so that he can call upon the national guard to protect his resources, his real-estate, his vast holdings. And as far as black shootings go, the fact is that more whites get shot and killed by cops than blacks, and more blacks get killed by the hands of other blacks than by whites or especially white cops.

It seems people prefer being thought of as Americans first - LEGAL Americans at that, and not illegal hispanics or middle-eastern refugees that have little interest in learning English or becoming Americans but who want to maintain their national identity while availing themselves of illegal jobs that continue to put downward pressure on legal jobs and law-abiding American citizens.  As (black or brown or white or yellow) Americans, people can point to globalist corporations outsourcing their jobs or foreigners sweeping over hole-riddled borders as the 'enemy' and not someone who's skin is a different color or who's taste in music is different.  

George Soros - Public Enemy Number One

At this very moment Soros has classified ads up advertising $35.00 per hour now (up from $15 and then $18) to protest Trump at various Trump properties. Seems he was paying people $1,500 plus medical and a cellphone to protest Trump rallies, carrying Bernie Sanders signs.....the better to pit one opponent against another. Where is the FBI on this?! Is InfoWars and the alt.media the only source of facts pertaining to the true origin of the violence Democrats supposedly fear in a Trump presidency? Do we need to have James O'Keiffe and Project Veritas go into every scheming back room where corrupt Democrats are working overtime to divide and conquer, to pit the races against each other?

Sadly, many small-skulled dimbulbs nationwide bought into the public-relations firms' campaign to attribute the popularity of Trump's campaign to “white supremacy”, but this is largely borne out by the fact many of them openly admit they prefer to let these PR firms (a/k/a CNN, MSNBC, Washington Post, New York Times, etc) do their thinking for them. Unbelievable, but true! I actually read a Facebook post by someone supposedly smart enough to rub their own brain cells together, smart enough to know better, who openly admitted to this and defended the practice! No WONDER we're tyrannized by the stupidity of sheeple! Thanks to Wikileaks and the alt.media, there's no excuse any more. The facts are in plain sight, including the most damaging news that only emerged in the last days of the campaign: senior campaign staff, and allegedly the candidate herself, are involved in child pedophilia and have participated in satanic rituals designed to call upon the forces of demons from another dimension to assist in sating their lust for power.

Does the Left even have a future?

The Left, or what's left of it, can be encapsulated by the policy prescriptions of Bernie Sanders, who had the Democratic nomination stolen from him (but mysteriously did not fight back, supposedly because the minions of Hillary had some type of 'leverage' over him as attested to in Wikileaks). That message was very similar to the one espoused by Trump, (which is one reason many Bernie supporters got on the TrumpTrain enthusiastically) but unfortunately was silenced and placated by hollow promises (the hollowness spelled out again in Wikileaks) made by Hillary's staff as they held out olive branches to the platform committee. That 'platform committee' is where all good candidates' ideals are put out to pasture as a consolation prize; designed never to reach fruition but maybe convince dim bulbs – like Michael Moore turned out to be – that the winning candidate was actually interested in incorporating their ideas into their policy planning. Hah! Maybe one day, once the genuine progressives and humble Democrats are able to go into the Democratic National Committee and scrub out the stench of the Clintons and their smug, warmongering neo-con allies, there will be a true competitor for national leadership, but until then, the American party of Donald Trump will lead both the free world and the “land of the free and the home of the brave”, and the People shall rejoice as common sense – from both the right and left wings of the poltical arena – returns to Washington DC after an absence of decades, to “drain the swamp” and rebuild the nation.

For a time.  There's still a poleshift a' comin', and a lot of work to do to prepare for it. Meanwhile, ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do to help Make America Great Again.


Sunday, September 11, 2016

Why All Intelligent Democrats Should Vote For Donald Trump

DISCLAIMER: During the first Clinton administration, I faxed G. Gordon Liddy (the radio talk-show host who had originally gained fame as one of the Watergate burglars) a spirited defense of Hillary Clinton for her work with the Children's Defense Fund, which he read on-air in response to his criticisms of her. Furthermore, I worked for hundreds of hours as a volunteer for her husband's campaign, helping to elect him for not one but two terms. On my living room wall I display a picture taken by the presidential photographer of me shaking his hand when he came to my workplace to begin discussions on health-care reform in 1994. I also display a letter Pres. Clinton sent me thanking me for my support during his impeachment.



REAL Democrats DON'T Steal Elections

(and a fair and balanced mainstream media would openly investigate such travesties)

The first thing that any Democrat has to say to him or herself, “is there enough evidence to show that Hillary Clinton stole this nomination from her primary opponent, Bernie Sanders?” The evidence does indeed show that she did, through her minions, as continued leaks via WikiLeaks are now proving. Can we prove that Hillary herself gave the orders, or approved them, to have the voting rolls purged, the ballot boxes flipped, removed, manipulated, etc? No, but what do our lying eyes tell us? As we look at the people involved that were either suspected of planning to testify against the Clintons or were found to have betrayed them in some way or had “discovered religion” about the corrupt practices they found themselves caught up in, we see a pattern. Going back to Vince Foster, who's death really needs to be exhumed from the files and investigated more thoroughly, while listening to former Clinton self-confessed hit-man Larry Nichols detail how they would steal elections, we see the too-coincidental-for-fiction deaths of UN Gen. Assembly president John Ashe (scheduled to testify the following day, and found with a barbell of weights crushing his wind-pipe – a sure symbol of “keep all your mouths shut”); Shawn Lucas (a process server who had just served the DNC with a lawsuit claiming election fraud and who's cause of death is still unknown, while Hillary's campaign lawyer tries to move the lawsuit “into the weeds” - in the words of Wall Street On Parade – The Citizen's Guide To Wall Street yesterday), Seth Rich (the DNC's data director, who apparently was the source for WikiLeaks' access to the DNC emails; Rich was shot in the back while on the phone with his Mom at 4:19am Monday morning July 11th, no robbery was involved), Victor Thorn (author of the series of exposes on the Clinton's shady dealings over the years, from the cocaine-running at Mena Airport to the rapes by Bill Clinton of children younger than the age of consent), and numerous others either too obscure to mention or too unknown to connect directly with motive to the Clintons' ambitions.


Simply put, stealing an election, a nomination, is one of the most heinous and evil acts anyone can engage in, from the minions flipping the machines and purging voting rolls to the candidate him-or-herself. Essentially it is attempting to take from the People, the public, the person they are voting to give their power to, to act in their interests. By definition, anyone trying to take that away from them is NOT acting in their interests – they are instead working for their OWN interests, to which they feel they can subordinate the public's interest. The hunger for control can be such that money and power can be used to bribe those that are involved in such theft, and is but one more example of the axiom “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”. It is NOT ENOUGH to simply brush aside such claims and evidence with the typical shouder-shrugging and hand-wringing that “all politicians do it, so why bother complaining”. FULL STOP. NO! There should be NO going forward until punishment is meted out for such theft, and in order to punish the offenders, evidence must be put forward and arrests made. Perpetrators should be rounded up, charged and punishments ordered from on high.

Has anything of the sort occurred? Apparently not; Hillary Clinton is like the evil step-sister who stole the glass slipper from Cinderella, such is her greediness for power. We don't know how she can sleep at night, knowing that she was not the choice of the majority of Democrats. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact that the six major media conglomerates that control practically all of the media consumed by the average naive citizen have refused to even acknowledge this electoral fraud.  Instead they avoid it altogether and act as if she gained the nomination legitimately. 

Even the corporate shill we call our current president was in on the fraud, as most of us who merely observed watched in horror as the theft occurred with nary an outcry from either the corporate media or the law-enforcement organizations, despite the many hours of video footage showing the fraud taking place as well as the exit polls (which were later 'adjusted' to match the recorded totals, so as not to alarm the ignorant public that there was such a wide discrepancy in many states that it would have triggered claims of FRAUD if those primaries had occurred overseas under UN monitoring). 

NOTHING WAS DONE, so is it any wonder the naive and clueless among us think little of it? We were brought up to believe that the people on TV and in the newspapers were good people and interested in bringing the news to us, but only those well on the way to their 'Awakening' realize how much of an illusion that is. 

Few people understand the role the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) has played in our Western belief system since its founding in 1913. From the very beginning, the CFR's mission has been to mold public opinion by placing “senior editors” [i.e. censors] in the newsrooms of the broadcast networks and newspapers, to insure that nothing gets into the public consciousness that could threaten either profits or the orderly operations of their corporations and business interests. Yes, there are other groups that are involved in this effort, but I single out the CFR because Hillary can easily be seen in a well-known video clip standing at the podium of the CFR early on in her career as Secretary of State describing how glad she is that she doesn't have to go all the way to the “mothership in New York” to “be told what she should be doing and how we should think about the future” now that there is a CFR 'outpost' on Capitol Hill. For those who have a hard time taking this claim seriously, you can watch her say those exact words, live at the CFR itself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfpgl6NqF0I

The point is clear: The organs of the US government take their marching orders from non-governmental bodies such as the CFR, as does the corporate media. The candidates and mainstream media are beholden to these shadowy powers (does anyone really believe that all the hedge-fund banks and financial institutions aren't expecting something in return for their huuuge donations?!?), and when it becomes clear – as it did today, if not before – that their preferred candidate is teetering on her last legs health-wise (literally!), what will they do? Do they think they can convince the anti-Establishment Trump that they can now work with him? Not likely, as Trump's main agenda is to take down the Bush-Clinton crime cabal and restore a sense of American pride in the large swaths of the population that have suffered the indignities bestowed on them by the elites, who show their condescension of their fellow Americans outside the major globalist centers by categorizing them as a “basket of deplorables”. (That was Hillary's recent comment, one which she apologized for 17 hours later since it went viral as this election's version of Romney's “47% of Americans are takers, not makers”).

My well-meaning but naive fellow progressives who vainly continue to maintain support for the corrupt and fraudulent Hillary are probably unaware of how dangerous as well as evil (YES, let's use the word: EVIL) this female candidate is. Perhaps the paleo-feminists such as Madeleine Albright continue to support her because they are permanently wedded to the concept of the “first female president”, without concern for whether she be qualified or not, but being purposefully blinded is the same as being willfully malevolent, and this “first female major-party candidate” should be gently taken into custody and upon trial and conviction by her peers, be arranged to be horse-whipped coast-to-coast. Actually that would be too cruel, and death would be too kind, so I would modify the punishment: no horse-whips, but the type of school paddle that was used in the classrooms of the 1930s through the 1970s. Every citizen could – upon payment of a small token fee to help defray the costs of hauling her carcass around from town to town, coast-to-coast – have a whack at her behind to help assuage their anger and misery.

Democrats, REAL Democrats, who believe in equality and fairness for all, do not steal elections – to do such a thing bespeaks an elitism far beyond even Republicanism. Only someone who thinks they are better equipped than anyone else claiming to fulfill the “will of the People” would even dare try to steal an election.

The Democratic Party is in a state of deep-freeze; one day, finally rid of the corruption, venality and fraudulence of the Clintons and their minions, it will hopefully rise again. First, the interlopers and their cohorts must be scrubbed from the ranks of the party, and it will probably take a concerted effort on the part of a Pres. Trump and his Democratic allies to do so. The fate of the Party should not hinge on the temporary criminality of one crime family.

Another reason why intelligent Democrats should make common cause with Donald Trump is because this is not an election between “conservative” and “liberal”, or “right” vs “left” - this is between the globalist Establishment (a/k/a 'New World Order') and the American people, much as the Brexit vote was a blow against the globalists by the British people.

The primary goal of globalism is to commodify all labor, to reduce every human to the status of a consumer and labor-unit. To do this, it scorns all forms of populism and nationalism as the last vestiges of a racist, sexist, misogynistic society that needs to be cowed into submission by secretive efforts to divide and conquer, using the very claims of racism and sexism to do so. By funding divisive movements such as Black Lives Matter, as Hillary Clinton's primary benefactor George Soros does, they hope to pit the races against each other and keep them at each others' throats – instead of uniting them in expressions of nationalistic unity that would impede the globalist goal of a single world-wide police state of consumers and labor-units. It's well-known that “all lives matter”, but by emphasizing the racial aspect of police brutality instead of the brutality aspect of excessive and punitive law-enforcement, it continues to subtly push the idea that the enemy is overly-armed, overly-aggressive white males....which is not borne out in the rest of popular culture.

Instead, the white male – who is no longer the privileged human that previously did all the bread-winning for the typical American family – has been left with few employment options outside of fast-food service or the medical field (aside from the few who achieve enough academic success to snag one of the few jobs in education, engineering, or Silicon Valley). Furthermore, the white male is continuously portrayed in popular culture as either lazy, stupid, nerdy or all three. Take a look at virtually any commercial which includes a white male; this is NOT your father's culture. Even rock n' roll is no longer a dream career for young white males – as with sports, most role models in music are now non-white, and there are as many if not more female pop music stars than male. In almost every category of human endeavor, females are now just as prevalent – as they should be. Non-whites are even more prevalent in music, and most white males who look to make a career in it seem to gravitate to what's still known as “country”, which has adopted the accouterments of rock n' roll, but with none of the revolutionary fervor that threatens globalism.

Trump harkens not to “white supremacy”, but he does offer the antidote to the “identity politics” that has degraded the hopes and dreams of many Americans. “Identity politics” pushes the idea that all those who had been subordinate to a majority that were white (by happenstance of birth rate and immigration laws) and predominantly male (by cultural heritage in which the male worked while the female stayed home and raised the children) should “stand up” for their particular demographic niche, usually in a resistant or even hostile manner. Hillary Clinton has now been revealed, in correspondence with the well-known Sixties radical Saul Alinsky, to have a deep-seated belief in the need for social reformers to “agitate”, for the divisions in society to be “rubbed raw”. As a one-time adherent of radical politics in the generation immediately following hers, I know of this trait, and I have abhorred it. It's but another example of “divide and conquer”, and considered in light of the immense corruption Hillary has been involved throughout her adult life as First Lady and US senator, as well as Secretary of State, it should ring loud alarm bells in any intelligent civic-minded American. Few people, whether Democratic, Republican, Socialist or Libertarian, can feel confident that anything she says can be believed, as her tendency to lie is well-known. This would account for how few people show up to hear or see her speak, as the conviction necessary to rally large crowds is missing. She can't deliver it because she doesn't have it. She can copy others, as she usually does, and when down or cornered pull out the paleo-feminist claim that it's all due to “men”, but the truth is she is known to be running for President not because she has passionate ideals she wants to implement to raise the standard of living and happiness of Americans, she's doing it all for herself. It's all about her, and it shows.

Trump, as the recent Hillary comment about “basket of deplorables” shows, is rallying Americans of all colors, all ages, all stripes, against the perceived failure of the elites to do anything to raise the “contentment” index. While Hillary may like to think her efforts to demonize him by equating his raw bellicosity with all the evils that used to bedevil white males, it simply doesn't stick outside the few urban islands filled with highly intelligent (but relatively unaware and naive) professionals that look down condescendingly on those who live in the vast hinterlands of the continent. Did Trump say some shocking things? Yes, and early on I saw the political acumen he employed in how and why he did it – they alienated those that insist on fighting political battles on traditional issues in a milquetoast manner, while attracting to his side the many alienated “low information voters” that had been ignored in recent years but certainly know their lives have lost opportunities, not gained. To compare his “politically incorrect” statements to the known crimes of Hillary is no comparison. 

Let's use one example, one that will show how Hillary's much-vaunted “experience” is actually a negative and should be known about but is rarely discussed.

This example comes to us courtesy of the Benghazi hearings along with the leaked emails that resulted from it. While most people know that the US ambassador to Libya was killed in an attack on the Benghazi “annex”, few know the circumstances. Some of us have even come to believe that it was one more milestone in the Clintons' trail of murders, this one to silence a potential critic (Ambassador Christopher Stevens) who was about to blow the whistle on the criminal arms-trading that his boss Hillary had been engaged in, shipping arms to Syria through Libya, but we'll put aside that explosive contention for the moment and focus solely on the decisions that left the Benghazi annex defenseless. It's come to light that embassy personnel had repeatedly requested additional security personnel, and had not only been denied it, but had been ordered to remove the one piece of defensive fire-power they had positioned – a machine gun near the entrance to the facility. 

According to Hillary and the minions she passed the orders down through, even the sight of this machine gun, with its belts of ammunition, would be enough to upset the Libyan hosts, and should be removed in order to show that the Americans meant no harm. And when Ambassador Stevens requested additional personnel, Marines that are used to protect embassies (the Benghazi complex was an “annex”, not the actual embassy) were also seen as “too provocative”, so the ambassador's request was denied. Even after the attack had begun, security personnel were not sent, not immediately any way, and any reasonable researcher who delves into what happened can only come away with either of two conclusions: the elements of the US Sate Dept and Defense Dept (the carrier group that eventually responded) were either grossly stupid and naive, the type of bumbling government servants whose stupidity 'allowed' such events as 9/11, or there was an intentional murder of an American ambassador who knew too much.

The above example is but one reason why intelligent Democrats shoujld recognize that Trump's charge Hillary has extremely poor judgement goes beyond the usual reference to her disasterous vote in support of the Iraq war. She would like to put that behind her with the typical “I made a mistake, I'm sorry, I won't do it again”, but she did. Her actions in Libya (her premature gloating revealed in the emails' references to 'tick tock' show that she was just as arrogant about Libya as Bush Jr was about Iraq) show this. Experience does NOT equal judgement, and her consistent warmongering and coziness with arms dealers, foreign donors and governments shows this.

One last reason for why intelligent Democrats should take this opportunity to vote for the Republican this one time is also important: Donald Trump has not made the usual inflammatory comments that demonize the core values most Democrats hold, or even Democrats themselves (he's appealing to the many Bernie supporters that are livid from the outright theft of the nomination, and....it's working). Actually this is one reason Establishment Republicans are just as scared of him as Establishment Democrats: they stand to lose if Trump is elected and begins to carry out his mandate. When the People win, the elites will – by definition this time – lose. That's not always the case, but the Establishment elites have been slowly degrading the People for a long time, both Democrats and Republicans, particularly the Bush-Clinton crime cabal (which is extensively documented, but this is not the place to go into those details).

In fact, many core values that make us all Americans transcend the current political philosophies of either party, and can be found in the one Founding Father both parties call their own – Thomas Jefferson. Our biggest enemy isn't necessarily a foreign country, it is the central bankers Jefferson warned us about. Trump knows this, and allegedly is supported by the most powerful Rothschild of all (one who is not known to the public; the Nate and Jacob Rothschilds that many in the truth-seeking community like to think are the main Rothschilds are simply regular billionaires, not the quadrillionaire that sits atop the main pile, though he sits alone among the bankers in his attempts to help prepare Earth for what's coming). He is appealing to those that want to feel part of the egalitarian American community that even Millenials are taught at school, though they may not have to take civics courses any more.

Smug sociologists will be stunned by the demographics of the Trump electorate, once it's allowed to be shown: large numbers of intelligent African-Americans will defect to Trump's side in response to a genuine appeal to them as equals in the great American Experiment, and the same will happen with members of the LBGT community. If anyone questions that, let them watch his acceptance speech at the GOP nominating convention – even I was shocked to hear how heart-felt his comment was about how glad it made him feel to hear the level of applause to his appeal to the LBGT community, particularly because of the GOP's previous record with that community's issues.

Finally, there is the insistent push on the part of the corrupt Republicrat party apparatus backing Hillary to demonize the Russian leader, Vladimir Putin, particularly because he made a complimentary statement about Trump in public. To them, this is akin to some form of Unamericanism on the part of Trump. First, how can it be said that Trump is somehow guilty of being “unpatriotic” because a foreign leader said something nice about him? Did Trump say something nice about Putin? Did he say something incorrect is the proper question. Trump acknowledged what most of us know but are afraid to say: Vladimir Putin is more respected among his people (an 82% approval rating at last count, by Gallup if memory serves) than Obama is among Americans (less than 47% at last count, by Gallup once again). Sad – but TRUE. Putin is often accused of crimes that few Americans realize are conducted by all world leaders, particularly their own – Obama. Does he do anything that corporate America doesn't do? Well, we can look at the RT television and radio network, to which many well-known American celebrities have flocked to along with huge swaths of the US viewing audience (don't believe me? Witness Hillary's and John Kerry's public comments about them, how they're “winning the TV wars”, how “we need something like that here”.....hey guys, why not just tell CNN and FOX to start telling the truth for once and cover such things as the rampant election fraud?!?).

One such TV host who now has a show on RT, Larry King, interviewed Trump a few nights ago, and this interview was dissected line by line on US corporate media, with talking heads on CNN, Fox, and MSNBC all claiming it proved Trump was being “unamerican” and “pro-Putin”. What balderdash! How insulting! Trump reiterated how he didn't know whether Russia was involved in the hacking of Hillary's and the DNC's emails, but does it even matter when Julian Assange of Wikileaks has practically admitted that it was Seth Rich, a DNC employee who blew the whistle and leaked directly to Wikileaks when he saw the evil and criminal actions Hillary and her minions were engaged in? Seth Rich was gunned down at 4:19am on the morning of July 11th near his home in Washington DC by gunmen who had allegedly lured him there posing as FBI agents that would take his statements regarding the pay-to-play scheme the Clinton Foundation was engaged in. While some have tried to suggest it was merely a robbery, intelligent and critical thinkers who read further that nothing of value was taken from his body can conclude that the murder was both in retaliation for the leaking of the emails and to prevent his testimony from exposing Clinton collusion and corruption. The fact that many of my friends who are otherwise intelligent and well-meaning avoid all these ugly connections and connected dots is both stunning and alarming to me, because they have been hypnotized into thinking that Big Ole Meany Donald Trump said some Mean Things, and just as bad, Bad Guys like David Duke like him. What they fail to see is that Hillary has her fair share of KKK donors (one group of KKK police officers donated $20,000 to her last presidentail campaign, and as the officer chillingly described, they have every reason to believe she hasn't changed since), and not only white-supremacists support her but black racists support her. For that matter, a Black Panther group has now endorsed Trump, so where does a voter draw the line? 

Does it matter which candidate racists of any color support? I personally think black racism is now more prevalent than white racism, in 2016, and for that matter most racism is bent not only on doing damage to the other color, but in asserting identity. Trump represents a diverse, vibrant, colorful society of Americans, one that subordinates color and race to being an American first. The first and most important issue for all Americans is what it's always been: jobs, jobs, & jobs. Hillary stands with an incumbent who admittedly had to dig our way out of a deep, deep hole dug by his predecessor, and history may be kinder to his efforts to do that, but at present he is lauding a trade deal that would give corporate courts more power than sovereign states currently have, and flush even more jobs out of the country to Third World nations that are happy to perform the labor for pennies on the dollar.....a dollar which itself is precariously hanging on a thread and is destined shortly to be converted back to a gold-backed currency that has nothing to do with the criminal private enterprise known as the Federal Reserve.

Finally, the claims about the statements made by Trump early on in his campaign, the ones that were shown to attract the level of support he needed to beat 17 accomplished politicians to gain the nomination (and thus giving rise to the deplorable comment by Hillary recently about his supporters being a “basked of deplorables”, a “let them eat cake” comment if there ever was one), can be defended by any intelligent Democrat. He named “illegal aliens, illegals from Mexico”, and he was right. To call illegal immigrants “illegal” is accurate. Speaking as a political refugee that went to Canada to escape unwarranted surveillance outside my home every day, surveillance Snowden corroborated, I can speak to this issue with certainty. People entering the country illegally may have the best of intentions, but no matter how hard their claims pull heart-strings, they are here in America illegally and should face the consequences of breaking the law. Trump says what most Americans feel is at the root of their anger: there has been no accountability, and he promises to bring it. 

It doesn't matter that Obama has deported more illegal aliens than any of his predecessors – there are still many millions here illegally, and because a wall that can secure the border was never built, the problem continues day by day. Those that argue, like candidate Gary Johnson, there is no such thing as an “illegal alien”, who argue for an “open border”, are globalists that aspire to erase national and sovereign borders so that all labor world-wide will be dictated by the price at which desperate population flows in Third World countries such as Bangladesh wil do the work, and instead of factories once again springing up in the US, more will continue to flow out, and America's crumbling will accelerate, not be stemmed – as Trump and his supporters hope to do. Manhattan and Silicon Valley may continue to float in a sea of increasing ruin, but eventually even the smug inhabitants there will realize what folly globalism has been to the American way of life, and fewer and fewer will be able to afford their $5 lattes and $10 burritos any more. The “middle class” will be but a shadow of its former self, subordinate to the elite's dictums to manipulate the lower classes to accept their lot without complaint.

This is the state of affairs that Trump hopes to avoid, and if he's bellicose about it, it doesn't mean he's a sexist and misogynist – most women can easily see that he can be a boor at times but is respectful towards women that show him respect, just as he treats everyone that way. We may yearn for an FDR, but we can settle for a Napoleon. A subtle put-down directly to his face may result in an ugly outburst, but if accorded common decency, Trump is a decent man – not a racist, not a sexist, and not even a religious bigot. He never decried legal immigrants, he decried ILLEGAL immigrants who broke the law. How hard is that to accept? He never decried all muslims, he simply acknowledged what is now self-evident: the US, like Europe, is beginning to experience random acts of terror carried out by radical muslims, who believe in a version of Islam that justifies acts of violents against kafirs, or non-believers. Trump says that we should put a hold on allowing any new muslim immigrants into the country “until we figure out what's going on”. As a method of self-preservation, that's what intelligent leaders SHOULD call for. When a destructive trend shows itself, steps should be taken to get a grip on the situation and then to address it.

For example: anyone who studies the history of Islam should look at the history of that religion; it is NOT but a different sect that wants to merely practice its belief in peace, it is literally a belief system alien to everything in American history and cultural life. Yes, there are moderate versions of Islam that have concluded that the elements in the Islamic holy book the Quran that lay out Sharia law, that regulate how muslims should live with “non-believers” (or 'kafirs') are archaic and must be vocally condemned by those using the same book as their guide in other matters, but the religion itself is based on conquering not only non-believers but elements within the self – that jihad, or struggle, comes down to the individual's struggle. For an unorthodox understanding of Islam that will be helpful in the coming days, I recommend Dr. Bill Warner and his website, http://www.politcalislam.com . Dr. Warner has studied Islam for many years and has a healthy respect for it, but this is what he says about it:

It is frequently said that moderate Muslims can solve the problem of jihad and terror. Everyone has met nice Muslims, some of whom are willing to admit that Islam has problems and may even say that Islamic State is bad. Moderate Muslims are nice people who come to interfaith events, interviews and talks at schools and churches. Moderate Muslims even tell us that they are the real victim, not the Kafir.
Here is the problem—Islam cannot be changed by anybody, moderate or not. Islam is the civilizational doctrine found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Nobody can change the Sunna and the Koran. Their words are eternal, perfect and universal. Nobody can change Islam. It is fixed and frozen by its unalterable doctrine.
What we call moderation is simply ignoring the violence and hate. But the jihad cannot be removed, it can only be denied by ignoring it. A moderate has the same Allah and Mohammed that a jihadist has.
Moderate Islam is Islam light, Islam ignored. Islam changes Muslims; Muslims can only choose not to practice the dark side of Islam, but they cannot change it or get rid of it. Islamic doctrine is fixed, eternal, unchangeable and forever.


You may disagree with his view, but his facts are correct. He further goes on to state the fact that the most persecuted religious group in the world today are the Christians. The Golden Rule is under attack by practically every other religious group, and while it is true that the rulers of the state of Israel have persecuted the Palestinians among them for decades, it isn't the average Israeli citizen that has done so, the rulers that have stolen elections – such as the current fraud, Netanyahu – have committed many crimes against both Christian and Muslim Palestinians. Many would even say that the ultra-zionists behind the attempt to 'settle' Palestinian areas of the West Bank, and also behind the false-flag evil act of 9/11, are the most heinous and evil religious group of all – fomenting hatred of Christians by causing false-flag events that pin the evil on mad muslims. 

Well, now it's a reality, one that can be reasonably argued we created or at least awakened, and Trump wants to “get to the bottom of it”. Many of us can only pray that if he is elected that he carry out that effort faithfully, and will report on it faithfully; he was initially booed at the AIPAC convention because of his comments promising fairness as well as his love for Israel. Wait, what?!? Yes; it was his claim to be fair to the Palestinians that alienated him from that audience, because they aren't interested in being 'fair', they are interested in re-making Israel “whole”, as in one state; no “two-state solution” for them. Everyone liked his passionate love of Israel, but any mention of being “fair” to the Palestinians.....well, that brought a big round of boos. Ponder that.

A word now about the use of the term "alt", as Hillary has been using it of late to describe non-corporate media.  She claims the "alt-media", the "alt-right" (translation:  The Drudge Report, Alex Jones, and various YouTube news personalities who have taken it upon themselves to report their take on the daily news) is "rife with lies" and speaks condescendingly of such sources.  It may surprise many that her own best friend Sidney Blumenthal (yes, the same adviser whose online porn habits were so omniscient in the Bill Clinton White House that it caused the chief IT manager to have to de-infest the local network on a daily basis due to all the bugs and viruses he brought in) was the self-professed 'ghostwriter' of a hit piece that purported to be in the vein of the, ahem, "alt-media" but was filled with enough exaggerations to cast aspersions on anyone making any similar claims.  In this way, puppets of the corporate media attack the truth-seeking community, who have to constantly sift through piles of fecal material such as Blumenthal would write in his attempts to demean any media or message outside the CFR-controlled corporate media's message.


One last word about Hillary's minions' attempts to blame Russia for hacking her emails and for allegedly supporting her opponent. (We can suspect that Russia probably had hacked her private server ages ago, but has been clever enough to keep quiet about it.....critical thinkers will pick up on her hypocrisy.) Why is it that she doesn't want to work with Russia as an equal on the world stage, getting rid of ISIS (a terror group that she assisted in creating); was it she that arranged for them to purchase all that American military equipment? What about all those white Toyotas they drive around in, and those ski masks? While many in the West are very uncomfortable with the Russian law that criminalized “homosexual propaganda”, it is still a democracy, it is still trying to remove the ill effects of having a handful of oligarchs (who had been Communists in charge of government enterprises, emboldened and empowered by American black-ops arranging for allies post-breakup of the Soviet Union) corrupt public life. Yes, Putin has been aggressive in rebuilding his peoples' self-image, as he rightly should; he's no FDR, but did we expect him to be? He doesn't censor any of the American anchors on his RT network, not one iota, and now Jesse Ventura is joining his lineup, as Larry King and Ed Schultz (formerly of MSNBC, as progressive readers know) have already. Is he a 'bad guy'? What gives Hillary cause to blame him and Russia for hacking her email? Is it any worse than what she did to hide her emails from US govt and FOIA oversight? The hypocrisy is simply stunning....we now know, as I said earlier, that it was Seth Rich who hacked the DNC, and others have since claimed they were the hackers. Putin has been careful not to intervene in our election, but he's done nothing worse than our own corporate government has done. Prove me wrong if you doubt that! Meanwhile, our own US corporate media will hawk that line, but once again – critical thinking skills will help real truth-seekers. Our own govt is worse than most banana republics, having used the CIA to involve US corporate interests in upending and overturning many will-of-the-People elections and as said before, we can only pray that a President Trump will not only find this out, but make the facts public.


The stakes are very high this election, as they always are, and while I doubt anyone will succeed Obama/General Dunford in the Ofal Office on January 20th, 2017, we have to act as if life will go on, as the “last weeks” continue to be delayed.










Saturday, July 30, 2016

Dondep on "Beyond The Veil" - Saturday night, July 30th, 2016

08:30pm Sat. July 30

Original topics of discussion - The Saga of the Mysterious Dr. Dan Burisch and Majestic 12 with Dondep

"Was Dan Burisch really a friend of the Zeta Reticulan 'guest' of the US government in the bowels of S4 at the infamous Area 51? What secrets did he uncover, and what was he told about our future? Was the Ganesh Particle really the elusive 'God particle' so sought after, and did Burisch ever complete his Project Lotus for Majestic 12? What are we to make of the 'Looking Glass' – was it real or not, and was the DCTP really the Doctrine of Convergent Timeline Paradoxes? Or was it all a profound hoax? Dondep recounts his role as Henry Morton Stanley to Dan Burisch's Dr. Robert Livingstone before Majestic 12 officially 'released' him to the public, and discusses how much of the Burisch saga was a pre-planned attempt to make Dan Burisch the poster child – along with Chi'el'ah, the secret name of the J-Rod from Zeta Reticuli that was housed in the 'clean sphere' at S4 – of an alien Disclosure that never quite happened. 

Dondep explains why."

________________________________________________________________________

As it turned out, the discussion focused on the poleshift, stargates & Looking Glass, reality dislocation/sociological changes & matrix distortions, TIA [Total Information Awareness] and the surveillance state


To stream the archived show, go to: 

http://truthfrequencyradio.com/project-looking-glass-and-the-god-particle-with-don-deppeller/ 




                                                                 
                 
Thanks to Chris & Sheree Geo of Beyond The Veil and the Truth Frequency Radio network.

http://truthfrequencyradio.com

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

The Progressive Pivot - Why The Worm Turns To Trump


Understanding Why Both Our Political Leadership and Mainstream Media Have Utterly Failed Us In 2016


Election Fraud on Behalf of the Corrupt – The First Line of Disgust

Like most Americans observing and in many cases taking part in the presidential election of 2016, I've been convinced the system is indeed rigged, fixed, even orchestrated from behind the scenes. Of course I've felt that way for a long time, but always somehow seem to succumb to the blandishments of a seemingly-innocent MainStream Media in past elections. It doesn't take a Donald Trump to tell us what most of us know, but at least he's one of the main characters in this theatrical production that is declaring the obvious – the Big Six Media Emperors Wear No Clothes. In this cycle, however, more than any other election cycle in modern memory (or for that matter in the elite-controlled Official Memory History Books) the fraud is so utterly in-your-face, so self-evident, that it's downright insulting to anyone with half a brain. Establishment Liars are trotted out to tell us that Hillary – on the verge of pending indictments that should put her behind bars for the rest of her natural-born life – actually won most of the states the MSM [Main-Stream Media] claims she did, even as many of the votes in those states were still being counted. 

Unbelievable, right? Calling an election while thousands - yes, THOUSANDS - were still voting should anger anyone who knows the definition of the word "civics".  Yet these mouthpieces blandly assure the dimbulbs in the viewing audience that indeed she DID win all 6 of 6 coin tosses in Iowa. As the primary season rolled on, in state after state exit polls showed Bernie Sanders winning the vote (except in predominantly poor, Southern states where African-American Democratic voters outnumbered their white counterparts due to the success of the late disgraced former president Richard Nixon's vaunted 'Southern Strategy' that lured white Southern voters to the GOP back in the late 1960s and 1970s). Now exit polls are used to not only project the winner of an election before the votes can be fully counted, but also as yardsticks to determine election fraud. When used in the second manner, to monitor elections in foreign nations at the behest of the US State Dept (how utterly IRONIC! Please excuse me while I barf up a pet goat at the very thought), a deviation of more than 2% - between the exit polls and final voting outcome - is considered to be evidence of FRAUD. 

In the 2016 Democratic primaries, one applied mathematician and seasoned statistician has been able to show that in a majority of the state primaries there were deviations far exceeding the 4% MoE (Margin of Error, or difference between the exit poll and final recorded vote) that is usually allowed for in US elections. The adjectives “raw, unadjusted” soon crept in to describe exit polls, which were then “adjusted” to match the recorded vote. TRANSLATION: ADJUSTED EXIT POLLS ARE EXAMPLES OF ELECTION FRAUD, COMMITTED BY OR FOR THE MAINSTREAM CORPORATE MEDIA to ensure the election of their pre-selected candidates. Like the sly weavers that wove invisible clothes for the emperor, the fine folks at Edison Research will 'adjust' their initial findings for their single client, the National Exit Pool (which is comprised of ABC, AP [Assoc.Press], CBS, CNN, FOX, and NBC – MSNBC derives their findings from NBC) which receives its marching orders from the CFR [Council of Foreign Relations, the elitist control center for all information and propaganda deemed suitable for consumption by the clueless earthlings that put up with this control system].  Google Richard Charnin to review the excellent evidence that he's provided us with of the election fraud.

In other words, the numbers were cooked, so blithely and openly as to practically invite contempt, loathing and even retaliation by disenfranchised voters. Even voters who took the time and trouble to follow a tweeted link, or watch a YouTube channel in which video evidence is carefully laid out, could only watch in rage, indignation, or apathy as their reality was re-arranged by the criminals blithering on-camera for the propaganda organs. After all, what can they do, when this kind of theft of a nation's destiny takes place right under our very noses? If but one of these criminals could be taken into custody and threatened with malpractice for intentionally ignoring all efforts to have the issue investigated, if not outright admitted to, what does the reader think would happen? You guessed it; typical hand-wringin', shoulder-shruggin', buck-passin', an empty look in their evil eyes as if to say “I didn't see anything, I didn't say anything, I didn't hear anything”.

That's why, in a truly just world, these mal-practitioners of so-called journalism [and yes we will name names, as they know who they are....they're the talking heads of CNN, of FOX News, of CBS, of ABC, of NBC and MSNBC who profess to tell us the important news of the day AND the people they take their orders from, the people who talk into the earbuds that all the puppets wear when they're being televised] would be arrested, charged, and either imprisoned or hung for treason in countless cases of Grand Theft – Election in which they conspired to keep the truth from being told about the REAL winners. They conspired with their sub-contractors NEP and Edison Research, with the candidates who paid for expensive electronic hacking and ballot-box stuffing, with the clerks who carried out the purging of the voting rolls such as Chief Clerk Diane Haslett-Rudiano in Brooklyn NY who purged hundreds of thousands of voters....this same clerk had sold a condo - purchased in 1976 for $5,000 and listed for sale in 2013 for $1.5 million - to the daughter of a local congresswoman, Dana Lowey Luttway for $6.6 million.  Weeks after the sale, the congresswoman (also a SUPER-DELEGATE) endorses Hillary for prez. Clerk Diane lost her job while the matter is investigated, but the damage was done.  Who will undo it?  Bernie - and his supporters - were the real losers; is there a civil action we can initiate for redress?  

Once again, the facts prove why "it takes a pole-shift" to thoroughly clean house of these evil parasites, who circumvent all legality in search of personal profit. Is it any wonder why there was a Brexit?  A Trump?  And worse is yet to come.

Each example that deprived a single voter of having the right to cast his or her vote AND HAVE THAT VOTE RIGHTFULLY COUNTED should be an actionable charge against that reporter, that so-called journalist, that anchor, that editor, that executive, that producer, that government clerk, that party hack, that IT engineer, and yes, even the candidate that benefitted (no “who, me? But I didn't know this was being done on my behalf, not my fault!”). Oh yes, we WILL find the right linkage, and make it the responsibility of the candidate that benefited – that will greatly assist in ensuring this kind of malevolent evil hastily draws to a close.  I'm know I'm not alone in being sick and tired of being oppressed by the stupidity and selfishness of the Lowest Comic Denominator.  People often do bad things not because they're lazy ("oh I was just too LAZY to deal with two separate Blackberries, one for work and one to keep up with my yoga gal-pals") but because they INTENTIONALLY are HIDING THEIR CRIMINAL INTENTIONS ("no, don't get me a state department dot gov email; I don't want the risk of the personal being accessible" - true quote from Hillary email to aide Huma).  
Are you getting this yet? 

The question now before us is, how can we punish these criminal characters, without inciting the outmoded (and illegal) physical violence that they may well deserve but which will not effect the true karma necessary for a fulsome punishment? How can we change the behavior of these criminal master-minds at the helms of Disney/ABC, or Comcast/NBC, or CNN/Time-Warner, or Rupert Murdoch's FOX News? What about Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who bought the declining nearly-bankrupt Washington Post in order to establish an equal voice in the Establishment, commensurate with his parity to Sam Walton and WalMart? The Washington Post has been and will remain a part of this evil corporate conspiracy to sell us all a slanted version of reality and hide important truths and should be named as such in the class-action lawsuit that I think is necessary to overthrow their suppression of truth.  

The list of associated rhetorical questions about the Big Six media companies and their proteges could go on and on, but let's leave them there while we consider the evil promulgated by the would-be “leaders” who dance to their tune, or what passes for “American political leadership in 2016” which I contend will be destroyed shortly, and deserves to be.

I trust the reader knows that I speak of this destruction as a patriotic American, who feels his country has been under siege by an illegitimate force, a malevolent Establishment that has operated with a sense of arrogance and belief in its own superiority that has the right to steal votes from one candidate in order that their preferred candidate be coronated as if it was the “will of the People”. God, I can hardly stomach the thought....I hold these seemingly-powerful and corrupt humans in utter contempt, that they think they can usurp the Truth so easily simply because they have the power to broadcast a different version of reality than the public has voted for.  It's for this reason I say:


Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton Have Practically Destroyed the Moral Authority of the US Presidency

This is, we're told, the first time in history that a major-party candidate for the presidency is under a criminal investigation at this point in an election year.  And that's TWO criminal investigations, for the record.  Yep, it's true. We can only hope and pray the cavalry arrives in time and the offensive ones are taken away in handcuffs.  I'm almost ashamed (but no, not quite; the alternative would've been infinitely worse to the average American) that I had once supported and worked hard for POTUS Obama and for Madame Secretary's husband, the former president, for I now realize how utterly corrupt and corporate they are, how much more they care for corporate cash than for the actual lives of their constituents, and how much actual damage they've been allowed to act-out on the international stage.  In Hillary's case, she was so afraid of the American people seeing her emails that she refused to even get an official email for "occasional" use.  

Next, we have the almost-comical situation develop in which emails from her private server were being blocked by official State Dept. networks, which treated them as spam.  How ironic, yet how appropriate!  The boss can't even communicate with her minions, her employees who are paid by the taxpayer, because the security system of the State Dept. network considered her emails - from clintonemail.com - to be SPAM, and therefore blocked them!  Yes, it's absolutely true; her emails were considered SPAM and were blocked.  She couldn't communicate at all with any of her employees, via email (which was the main reason to develop email) because the technology involved considered her communications to be a THREAT.  And, as a result, nervous State Dept. IT engineers DISABLED SECURITY on the official network, so the boss's emails could find their way to their destination at a state dept dot gov address.  Take a moment and absorb what that means.  It means that the SECURITY SYSTEM of the State Dept. of the US was intentionally made vulnerable to hackers and foreign gov'ts, all to make it easier for the boss to use an illegal private server to communicate with her underlings. Why would she do that? Because she was afraid of having a trail of communications that would allow the public to see how she made deals, corrupt deals for cash - essentially selling her approval and access to the highest bidders.

It gets worse, but the long and short of it is this:  by arrogantly trying to avoid the public seeing ANY of her communications in the future, she jeopardized ALL of the nation's security - including especially the names of operatives and moles in dangerous areas of the globe.  Our friends AND enemies could see all the details and personalities involved in making diplomatic policy at the highest level, and even information from the SAP's (Special Access Programs, where pole-shift and alien-related information is kept) was exposed to hackers of all stripes.  If for no other reason, by committing such flagrant violations of protocols that had less-important employees not only fired but CHARGED UNDER THE ESPIONAGE ACT (YES, it's TRUE) it shows contempt for the laws the rest of us have to live by, and when that kind of arrogance shows up in our leaders, we respond by holding them in contempt.  The kind of contempt that strips these power-elitists of any moral authority they thought they had. Which is a bad thing, and we should fix it.

I may not agree with Trump on everything, but on the issue of Hillary Clinton being one of the most corrupt, if not THE most corrupt candidate ever to seek the presidency, he's right. Of course aging feminists are quick to point out how much of a bigot, a sexist and a racist Donald Trump is, but they won't take the time to admit their own candidate has actually already harmed American security - beginning with her vote to go to war in Iraq in 2003 and continuing through her mishandling of the Benghazi affair.  Would a Pres. Trump be any worse than this contemptible cretin?  Most women under the age of 45 reject Hillary and feel she is doing women a disservice by continuing to run when she is under such an ethical cloud.  Such a candidate, and her enabler that first hired her, hold no moral authority despite occupying positions which require it.

Worse, she continues to lie about it.  Personally, I have to marvel breathlessly at how novel her lies have become, how much she contorts the truth and then re-contorts it to fit new questions about it, and how smoothly she does so - as her infamous "remembering" of her trip to Bosnia kept changing every time new videotape surfaced to put the lie to her "memory".  Maybe she feels that by simply saying none of it's true it will make it so, but that's the purpose of this extended essay:  the truth has to be continually broadcast, or otherwise the short attention spans of average Americans will hear only the denials, as if these things have never happened.  Watch H.A. Goodman and the Sane Progressive (and many others) on YouTube if you don't believe me.

Don't get me wrong; as a proud progressive, I've found no pleasure in having to add one more angry voice about this fraud to the public, but the truth is more important than ideological purity.


Timidity – The Reaction By The Overly-Idealistic

Now, as for the candidate that has actually won the Democratic primary, the one who had his pockets picked clean by minions of the corrupt and Wicked Witch, we can only do a slow burn as we watch Bernie Sanders disrespect our votes for him by continuing to tie himself up in contortions in attempting to avoid calling out the thief who robbed him. As I've said before, Bernie Sanders appears too good for this world, certainly too good to go up against a corrupt thief on the scale of a Hillary Clinton. It's not that hard to continue to sound virtuous so long as you don't have to do the heavy lifting of calling out theft and election fraud, because of the concern you might come off as whining and complaining. Well, SO WHAT! It can be done, and done with class; use the time that's provided at the end of each primary night to voice your concerns, to let the voters know that you will STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR THE INVIOLABILITY OF THEIR VOTES! Why is it that even when a candidate knows he is being ripped off and the elections stolen from him that he does nothing to inform the public? It's one thing to lose, and certainly Bernie did not win every single state he contested, but he DID win at least 11 states more than he's been given credit for. What is holding him up? Certainly he must be aware of the theft, but he always seems to fall back on the old line about how “no-one knew who we were when we started this campaign, and look at us now!” Yeah, Bernie, look at you now: pockets freshly picked clean by your evil opponent, because billions of dollars in obscene profits are at stake and that Establishment that backs her is desperate for her to send you packing.... and not for Philly, of course. Among all the erstwhile American leaders and would-be leaders, you are the natural choice of the majority of Americans – if only the Establishment would allow it! But you know they won't. Not for one hot second; it's all they could do to avoid even covering your campaign, until they saw the value in drawing out a horse-race they pre-determined you wouldn't be allowed to win. Tsk, tsk! Yet we like your pluck, and your dogged determination, your “never say die!” attitude; we just wish some of it would (and possibly still might) translate into the willingness to acknowledge it publicly, the willingness to call out the fraud so that the psychically-fragile at least knew there was a fighter in the house that wouldn't allow themselves to be made a fool of when it comes to the election fraud. If you call it out at the convention and promise to take on the legal battle (even if you actually WIN the nomination when Hillary is indicted and will become unable to hold the office even if she were appointed), you will still come out the hero of the 2016 election, and in actuality the hero that took the reins without being as naive as you appeared in the first half of 2016. Can you do that, Bernie? Can we plead with you long enough, perhaps? Is that what it takes?  If not, then what will it take?

Corruption – The Virus That Ate Hillary Clinton

This issue is the main reason why so many of all political persuasions are so defeatist as to beggar belief; few are they that truly know the ins and outs of how a president achieves the office. What makes the difference between Hillary and Bill? While acting presidential, Bill hid this character flaw of using his office to solicit funds under a teflon coat. Unfortunately, Hillary's activities bear more scrutiny, for she seems to have been the principal fundraiser of the couple, offering her signature approving many arms deals and corporate purchases that were dubious at best and treasonous as worst. Google “Uranium One and Hillary Clinton” and you'll learn more than your conspiracy-resistant noggin can handle about this kind of thing that went on with regularity. Are we supposed to be loyal to such an erstwhile “leader”? I won't even mention the 47 murders (er, suicides, for the most part, or so it's claimed by 'official sources'), once again a ratio of odds that beggars the imagination. The entire presidential campaign of this corrupt woman has exhibited less to do with any particular movement or set of ideals, exemplified by a parallel record (her big achievements in the US Senate were sponsoring 3 bills, one naming a post office, one a highway, and one a museum)....no, the goal is simply to put Hillary Clinton in power and validate the many sacrifices she believes she's made. This is not a hallmark of what most Americans feel they deserve in the office of President, but a large chunk of the electorate will swallow her lies whole, believing the whole time that she's actually being forthright.

I used to believe in the “vast right-wing conspiracy” at one time, I must admit, but I see not a dime's worth of difference between this person and a Republican today, not if they can sell their values out for campaign cash.

The Geo-Political Impact And Fall-Out Of The Now-Spineless POTUS

This same erstwhile leader, the one who tens of millions mistakenly believe will be the next leader of the free world, has been the most prolific arms dealer in the modern history of the office of Secretary of State if the alternative media is to be believed. Isn't it true that she approved a sale of U.S. Federally-owned land to a Russian company that operated under guise of a Canadian company owned by the Russian firm Rosatom that mined uranium, a mineral critical to national security? Google "Uranium One" together with "Clinton Foundation" for the evidence. And what about the lesbian relationship she allegedly has with her chief aide, Huma Abedin, a lovely Saudi Arabian that hails from a nation that still approves stoning to death for adultery and homosexuality? A nation that's....”donated” tens and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation, the organization that transforms cold cash into beautiful images of wealthy Clintons relaxing in one of their many mansions or jetting off to Caribbean romantic getaways?  Being lesbian isn't a crime, but willfully accepting corrupt pay-offs from nations that stone women to death for it, and then not saying a single thing to them about it, is the type of hypocrisy that undermines moral authority.  This is but one reason why the presidency is held in such contempt.  It's not the crime, it's the cover-up.  

But that's old news, as is the fact that this is the same woman who prostrates herself before the "Khazarian mafia" as they brutally eliminate the Palestinian people from their land. Can you keep taking it, America? What loyalty do progressive Democrats have to such a venal person, who knowingly kisses Khazarian keister in order to maintain the profitable flow of US-made weapons that pollute the Holy Lands thanks to the oil-greed of the other half of this corrupt crime family, the Bushes?  What, have you never heard of the "Khazarian mafia"? Google it!  It's now a euphemism for the group of largely-Jewish (though not all of them are) banksters that practice some of the most heinous child-sacrifice and pedophilia imaginable as they conspire to funnel the world's populations into cheap-as-it-gets labor pools. Why do they do it? BECAUSE THEY CAN!  AND GET AWAY WITH IT! They use such grotesqueries to blackmail their would-be political puppets, and so far it seems to do the job.

It seems to be common knowledge on the internet that Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush laugh and joke about how they trade off the presidency between the two parties, because the People get tired of one party long enough to think the Other Party will be their salvation, yet despite the fact there are huge differences in the political ideologies, on these critical matters such as the illegitimate control of the US Treasury by the money-changers (hmm, make that MONEY-PRINTERS) there is NO DIFFERENCE.  Does it make a difference to you? Maybe you aren't convinced yet.  Study the books and videos of Kay Griggs and Cathy O'Brien.  The videos are available for free on YouTube and the books a nominal price on Amazon.  Study the evidence not for the salaciousness, but to understand how deep it gets and how warping a young person's sexuality and utilizing mind-control techniques can lead to political puppets that are positively dangerous to the citizenry.  Listen to what Cathy O'Brien has to say about her sexual encounters with Hillary Clinton, who she was "loaned" to by the late Sen. Robert Byrd (Byrd was Cathy's "owner", and Hillary was more interested in Cathy sexually than was her husband Bill).  Listen to Kay Griggs explain the institutionalized homosexuality that courses through the institutions that mold the military, and how her husband was a trained assassin that terminated the lives of political opponents to the regime, especially the Bush regime.

We can now call it the Republicrat party, as others before us have already figured out. If it's Blue's turn, then maybe just maybe the People will have better luck, and if it's Red's turn, the military-industrial complex wins more contracts in the guns-or-butter argument, but the secret gov't that rules us all wins every time no matter. What else do you call it when so-called "conservatives" like George Will and the Bush family rush to Hillary's side to defend her against Donald Trump, as they did this past week?  Oligarchs are now filling Hillary's campaign coffers, even as she tries to pal around with progressive stalwart Elizabeth Warren.  They pump out platitudes in such an insulting fashion it's hard to believe we live in a nation filled with so many people that never bother taking the time to scratch below the surface of what they're told by CNN and FOX News, who's owners continuously push the "inevitablility" of a Pres. Clinton. 

Boy are they in for a rude surprise soon!

Now, In matters of globalization and the degradation of the middle class by those money-printers of the privately-owned Federal Reserve, there is NO DIFFERENCE. Who will kick out the money-changers and parasitic banksters that collapsed the economy? Between the Tweedledeedee-hee-hee Democratic Party and the Tweedlebeedumb Republican Party, which was most responsible for impoverishing the People of their pensions and retirements and even shipped their jobs “off-shore”? Who will right that wrong for us? Oh, that's right, someone HAS offered to do that. Well, some of it anyway.  The deal-making artiste.

Thank you, Mr. Trump. We'll get to you too in a moment. I know you're more wily than your detractors on either side of the aisle will confess to. You play a dangerous game though, and each chicken you set free will eventually come home to roost, even if you end up being "installed" as the last POTUS (PuppetOfTheUnitedStates).  Still, if that happens, I'll feel much safer with you and some of your red-necked supporters than I would with a corrupt liar who will say anything and do anything for money and power.  We need a sense of being American now much more than the stale "identity politics" of the past 8 years, and I'm glad to see a strong segment of support for you among non-white ethnic communities as well as the LBGT community.


Enter The White Dragon Society – Ben Fulford's, Neil Keenan's and Everybody's Good Guys

Good news though.  The WDS, or White Dragon Society as Ben Fulford's fans know it, has promised to come through and has offered real gold-backed currency to the Western, i.e. Khazarian-controlled, bankers so they can stop destroying the global economy with their fiat currency they've long-since plundered the GDP with.  A "currency reset", or "RV" [re-valuation] has also been promised, and now resurgent tales of Leo Wanta and NESARA are twinkling in the eyes of the conspiracy-aware, twinkling in hopes for a "blue-sky shift" (sorry; not gonna happen).  If anyone reading wants to know more about this aspect, and how it is affecting the roll-out of the Big Announcement, then google at least two of the following terms together and go to work on your research: "Ben Fulford", "Neil Keenan", "Karen Hudes", "Currency Reset", "RV", "White Dragon Society", and/or "Federal Reserve".  Throw in "BRICS" too, for good measure. I'm eagerly waiting for the currency to begin to show "US Treasury Note" on it instead of "Federal Reserve Note", but I won't hold my breath.  I simply don't know enough about the so-called "currency reset" to know what's really going on with it.

The Khazarian Mafia – Its Purpose In Hiding Inside and Behind Israel

Now; who would stop the insane “Israel, right or wrong, and we know you do so much wrong but you pay handsomely” mind-set? Mr. Trump, while holding his enemies closer than his friends, strikes fear into the Khazarian controllers of Israel because he's threatened to “be fair”. Oh my gosh! How COULD he, he must hate Israel, to want to actually be fair to the Palestinians! We can't trust a man that seriously wants to be fair! (Or CAN we? Shouldn't we?)  What would the ultra-zionistas, the Jewish bankers and cronies known collectively now as the Khazarian mafia, actually do?  They are at the end of their rope, the rope that we will soon be hanging them with in real-time for all the damage they've done to life, liberty, the work ethic, brotherhood, justice, fairness, etc.  Most of us have proven to ourselves that the concept of "karma" is very real; what goes around DOES come around, and it's a'comin' around the bend soon.  Very soon.

Enter General Dunford – Acting President of the American Republic?

And so it goes, the vicious spiral downward; the geo-political implications of a potential female president who knows the population has to be disarmed as much as possible in order to carry out a dictatorial program of surveillance, of impoverishing globalization, of plentiful arms for Middle Eastern states to wage eternal war, of corruption of the highest order, and …...get ready for this: The President That Finally Discloses the Truth About Aliens and UFOS! Well, a partial truth anyway....one that's based on a Disclosure desired by the spiritually-negative aliens but not one that willingly admits these human leaders for the past 60+ years have known all about the pending poleshift, and the fact that indeed, deficits will NOT matter.  Go ahead and admit it, Dick Cheney!  Admit that's why you said that, that claim that "deficits don't matter" when you wanted the US Senate to approve $10billion a month to wage an illegal, illegitimate mercenary war that would allow you to parcel out tracts of oil deposits to your pals in the fossil-fuel industries.

No, we wouldn't be talking about the truthful Disclosure that Barack Obama was supposed to carry out last September, of 2015, but lost his courage to, forcing his resignation as the actual POTUS, to be replaced in power by the CJCS (that's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a/k/a General Joseph Dunford) as the Acting President of the Republic of the United States. The United States of America Inc. corporation, that operated the business of the United States, went bankrupt and was dissolved by Gen. Dunford in a silent coup that has set the stage for the synthetic martial law we are now living under – unbeknownst to practically the entire American population. Could this possibly be true?  Well, we know at least one thing that gives some credence to the claim that he actually DID march the Marines into the 12 Federal Reserve Banks and seized the books - of which there were two sets; how could it be otherwise, for a corrupt system, anyway?  We know that in the early part of last October 2015 the official website of the Federal Reserve went from being a .org to a .gov.  Yes, that little feature isn't so little; only an official part of the US gov't can use that domain name, and while most of the Clueless Americans had no idea the Federal Reserve had been a private organization since its inception in 1913 at Jekyl Island off the Georgia coast, and passed under cover of a Christmas Eve vote that year when most senators and congressmen were rushing home for the holidays, many of us very much DO, and to those of us who DO, that was a HUGE signal that something very BIG was - and is -  about to blow.

Uh-huh”, I can hear you muttering to yourself as you think to turn away, but if you've read this far then you might be curious enough, or aware enough to know there must be some truth to this as you muse over the claims of “Planet IX” being "discovered in our solar system" back in January, starting January 9th - (remember that "9" is the zetas' most sacred number!) and then again in March.   Pluto had been demoted a few years ago, in order to deflect from the awkwardness of using the dreaded 'Planet X', or 'PX', but this is indeed the same planet as all the tin-foil heads like myself have been talking about for years now. Yes, Mr. Obama (now 'spokesperson', not POTUS though the charade will continue until the first Big Event commences) was supposed to make the big Announcement in September of 2015 (if the zeta reticulans are correct this time, as they appear to be having been confirmed by much of the alternative news and conspiracy-aware community). It was at that time that the military's "Operation Jade Helm" was put into place, units mobilized, equipment relocated, stationed and secured, and preparations for the expected influx of the poor south-of-the-border migrants made. Mr. Obama was to step forward before either the cameras of the East Room, the microphones in the Oval Office, or the podium at the United Nations and announce the facts regarding the pending passage of Nibiru and the poleshift expected to result from it. In addition to the Disclosure of this coming event-of-the-ages, which unfortunately may lead to the horrific destruction of 90% of humanity, Mr. Obama was to Disclose the truth of the alien interaction, and how extraterrestrial beings have been in contact with human authorities to assist in the soul harvest that will accompany the poleshift by way of definition.

The Affidavit - Request To Admit that "Told The World" (To their collective meh)

I know this not only because I have secured the first public admission by the Majestic 12 group that such is the case, but because my five-plus senses, that includes my intuition, my continued review of the evidence as well as my conscience, have confirmed it. If it turns out that my intuition is correct, the facts will show that Mr. Obama has colluded with Gen. Dunford to present a changed power dynamic to the public in order to deflect the intense hatred most Republicans feel towards him (and many Democrats, too, who believe he has become a weak-willed corporate shill who is only advancing a globalist agenda.... we think he underwent a secret operation in which his spine was removed which often happens when Democrats get into power), even then I could embrace him with praise for his cunning humility.....if only it were true. Perhaps it will turn out to be, but at the moment we're faced with a misleading dance in public, and no I'm not referring to the tango he danced with the president of Argentina on the maiden voyage of his alleged powerlessness.  I'm talking about the appearance he has given of still being the President, but his last appearance at the last White House Correspondent's Dinner was telling.  Upon stepping up to the microphone, he said "the end of the Republic has never looked better!".  That was a signal to those who are aware of the truth behind the Big Lie Machine (i.e. CNN, MSNBC, FOX News, etc) that a plan is on-track to unveil the Big Secret to the Clueless Ones.

Behind The Scenes At The White House Before The Endorsement

I'm speaking of the false and superficial endorsement of Hillary he offered to the world, using the right words but oh, that was no “fired up for Hillary!” , that was more like “can't wait to nap!” Mr. Obama called for a private meeting with Bernie hours earlier, one in which a number of very private items were discussed, among them a cover story that has Mr. Obama pressing Bernie to 'concede', offering him the Veep slot for Hillary, while Bernie is to act like his demand that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the anti-Democratic Khazarian shill that chairs the corrupt Democratic National Committee, first be fired. Presenting the unified front that neither could agree to the other's demands, Bernie left Barack to cue up a short video of endorsement so that it can never be said this was a back-stabbing plot by MEN to 'rob her' of her 'rightful place'. By the time the indictments are handed down, either by the Attorney-General who has confirmed that an FBI recommendation to indict will be as good as done, or by the Pentagon-impaneled grand jury that will unveil the truth about the new Dunford-controlled power-dynamic, there will be no-one left to blame among all her smiling supporters and it is for this reason that Bernie Sanders has had to play this very delicately. His job will be to convince Hillary's supporters that he can carry the banner for them, too. He's not as scary as Donald Trump is, for them anyway. In fact, many will argue that Bernie Sanders is the closest descendant of FDR the Party could ever hope to have, IF ONLY THE CROOKED ESTABLISHMENT WILL ALLOW IT. Truly the People's choice, but we live in a world controlled up until recently by the likes of George Bush, Bill Clinton, and an Establishment of pedophilia-compromised politicians and their bankster-gangsters co-conspirators.

Does this state of affairs agree with you? Or does it fill you with a sense of revulsion, of contempt, so much so that you would vote to have the necessary rule of law applied, arrests made, the charges laid out, and the punishment as called for by the Constitution of the original United States applied? Or do you think it still can't be done?

YOU TOO, Bernie Sanders!

One last thing you should know, Bernie:  Please stop falling into the corrupt DNC's delusion in which you can castigate the Opponent as being a bigot and a racist and a misogynistic sexist; Mr. Trump made it clear he is opposed to ILLEGAL immigration, not LEGAL immigration. (Yes, sometimes they are conflated by bad actors, but I think Mr Trump has a better heart than he's given credit for.)  And heart is extremely important, particularly whether it's a good one or not.  It positively GALLS many of us who call ourselves progressives when idiots seem not to hear the important distinctions that are made.  Anti-illegal immigration is NOT a cover for anti-immigrant xenophobia. Maybe that was more true in the past, but certainly not today.  The same goes for the issue of a TEMPORARY ban on Muslim immigrants of ALL kinds; perhaps it IS the smarter and wiser approach to profile would-be immigrants and then proceed with caution, without assumption, but with a clear-eyed realistic appraisal that many muslims from war-torn countries ARE resentful of America and Americans.  Wouldn't you be?  You yourself know for a fact that we went into those countries illegally; you know for a fact that we molly-coddle Khazarian regimes (the ultra-zionistas that hide behind innocent and good-hearted Jews so they can accuse anyone who doesn't accept their dictates as somehow being 'anti-Semitic'), and that those chickens WILL come home to roost, ARE coming home to roost, and it is better to put a temporary ban in place UNTIL WE FIGURE THIS OUT.  

Translation, Bernie:  UNTL WE CAN ADMIT PUBLICLY WHO REALLY CARRIED OUT 9/11, UNTIL WE CAN ADMIT WE HAVE NOT BEEN FAIR BROKERS IN THE PEACE PROCESS IN THE SEARCH FOR A PEACEFUL TWO-STATE SOLUTION IN PALESTINE, UNTIL WE CAN START TO PUBLICLY DIFFERENTIATE THE LITERAL READING OF THE QURAN AND THE MODERATE TRANSLATION PEACEFUL MUSLIMS LIVE BY (and to do so without being afraid of encroaching on some politically-correct terminology), then we SHOULD hold those potential terrorists from operating on American soil until we can be assured they will become Americans first and remain Muslims second.  This is a KEY CONCEPT and should be applied to all questions of ethnic strife across the land.

Am I making sense yet?  Some things I can't spell out, but you should understand anyway.

The Events of September 11th, 2001 – Are they connected?

Perhaps you still think the events of 9/11/2001 were carried out by 19 Saudi hijackers, or have you at least moved to admit that the 28 missing pages that will implicate the Saudi Arabians more deeply will be the end of it? Are you aware yet that kerosene won't melt steel, and those twin towers did NOT come down as the result of being hit in their sides by aluminum jetliners with plastic nose-cones? Have you studied the implications of the “pulling” of Building 7, the third building in the World Trade Center that came down that day? Perhaps you know of the financial bonds that were to come due the next day, bonds purchased 10 years prior by George H.W. Bush and his cronies in the Carlyle Group? Maybe you are already aware of how the records of the “missing” $2.3 TRILLION dollars at the Pentagon were moved that very day to the targeted area of the building, the weapon being not an American airliner but a missile made to look like one? 

Oh, that picture of a blank whitish missile without markings was an image designed to blur that very truth, so that truth-seekers who want an honest accounting will toss out the claim at the first sign of push-back by the Cover-Up artists whose job it is to bamboozle the dim-witted nationwide, even world-wide. Did you think it would be that easy, that the power of billions of dollars wouldn't be used to cover-up evidence of the evil? These corrupt “leaders” are even more evil, more deadly in how they plan to abuse the power they yearn to exercise....power begets power, and there is much truth to the claim that absolute power corrupts absolutely.  Yet they lie to our face, constantly, when in public. They are indeed practiced in the arts of deception, and many Americans sadly still buy it.

Maybe they'll also buy the new tell-all book by Gary Byrne, the former Secret Service agent who spills the beans about the Clintons' life in the White House, with Bill's constant philandering and the endless fights between them when she shrieked, yelled, threw things like vases and even a hefty upper-cut that gave him a black eye. Ooooh she hated it when he "dented the Clinton brand" by getting caught with a young female.  Often they would smile for the cameras and glower hatefully after the lights were turned off.  Okay, that's understandable at times, but the many times she would outright lie were, as he illustrates in vivid language, "breath-taking".  To think that so much of what she said was a lie or part of a lie is debilitating.  I simply can't give any respect to such a "leader"; instead, they provoke only contempt.  We have our own foibles, but if we're wise we try to work on them, not exult in how blatantly we can get away with it.  

The question remains, would a just God, a just Creator, a justly divine force that rules via karma, allow for such a state of affairs?

Perhaps it's because we are on the verge of a pole-shift that this election-from-hell will end up being postponed, likely due to the indictment of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but it could also be postponed by the rupture of the New Madrid Seismic Fault Zone in the heart of the US, literally ripping the country roughly in half both physically as well as metaphorically. 

Obama-as-Lincoln

Obama-as-Lincoln held much promise, but barely delivered on anything and when he did, it was a win for corporatism, the Khazarian mob, and he barely got a few slices of the loaf he never really showed he fought for...... for the most part he rode the coat-tails of the hopes and aspirations of the minority-empowered he drove to the polls in 2008. He may yet prove his wiliness will shock us beyond belief, but no matter what happens, the feeling is almost palpable that the personality of his would-be successor Donald J. Trump is, in its own Napoleonic way, the necessary antidote to the “lead-from-behind” blandness of his predecessor. We could do worse, much worse.  For instance,we could still be saddled with:

The Bush-Clinton crime-family cabal.

Please do your part in preventing that from happening. Despite the corporate media trying to sell you the idea that Bernie Sanders is a spent force, see to it that he's nominated and that Hillary faces a just legal punishment under the rule of law, that Donald Trump is allowed to take his place as the nominee of the Other Party, and brace yourself for earth changes the likes of what you've never seen before as well as seeing a friendly military in the streets. Let your voice be heard, that they remain friendly and on the side of the public, not the corporations that fear our freedom. While I don't think they'll be there to shackle you to the insides of rail cars shipping slave labor to the FEMA camps, I know they'll be there to ensure the roads and bridges are passable, that the food that can be grown and distributed is allowed to do so without vandalism, and that electric power is restored when need be as civilization slowly submerges into constant stress on every front.

Just remember; this ain't no Doom n' Gloom, it's a challenge and an opportunity to see the corruption and selfishness, the fraudulence, the LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY, finally meet its karma.  And the rest of us can get on with witnessing justice, though a hard justice, finally take place.

God bless these United States of America, the Republic NOT the fictitious Corporation that has acted in its name for so long, and that genuinely heroic leaders arise to help us in our hours of need. May we all soon find ourselves on the same page, and the real work begins.

 And thank you for listening.



© Dondep 2016 Summer Solstice