DISCLAIMER:
During the first Clinton administration, I faxed G. Gordon Liddy
(the radio talk-show host who had originally gained fame as one of
the Watergate burglars) a spirited defense of Hillary Clinton for her
work with the Children's Defense Fund, which he read on-air in
response to his criticisms of her. Furthermore, I worked for
hundreds of hours as a volunteer for her husband's campaign, helping
to elect him for not one but two terms. On my living room wall I
display a picture taken by the presidential photographer of me
shaking his hand when he came to my workplace to begin discussions on
health-care reform in 1994. I also display a letter
Pres. Clinton sent me thanking me for my support during his
impeachment.
REAL
Democrats DON'T Steal Elections
(and
a fair and balanced mainstream media would openly investigate such
travesties)
The
first thing that any Democrat has to say to him or herself, “is
there enough evidence to show that Hillary Clinton stole this
nomination from her primary opponent, Bernie Sanders?” The evidence
does indeed show that she did, through her minions, as continued
leaks via WikiLeaks are now proving. Can we prove that Hillary
herself gave the orders, or approved them, to have the voting rolls
purged, the ballot boxes flipped, removed, manipulated, etc? No, but
what do our lying eyes tell us? As we look at the people involved
that were either suspected of planning to testify against the
Clintons or were found to have betrayed them in some way or had
“discovered religion” about the corrupt practices they found
themselves caught up in, we see a pattern. Going back to Vince
Foster, who's death really needs to be exhumed from the files and
investigated more thoroughly, while listening to former Clinton
self-confessed hit-man Larry Nichols detail how they would steal
elections, we see the too-coincidental-for-fiction deaths of UN Gen.
Assembly president John Ashe (scheduled to testify the following day,
and found with a barbell of weights crushing his wind-pipe – a sure
symbol of “keep all your mouths shut”); Shawn Lucas (a process
server who had just served the DNC with a lawsuit claiming election
fraud and who's cause of death is still unknown, while Hillary's
campaign lawyer tries to move the lawsuit “into the weeds” - in
the words of Wall Street On Parade – The Citizen's Guide To Wall
Street yesterday), Seth Rich (the DNC's data director, who apparently
was the source for WikiLeaks' access to the DNC emails; Rich was shot
in the back while on the phone with his Mom at 4:19am Monday morning
July 11th, no robbery was involved), Victor Thorn (author of the
series of exposes on the Clinton's shady dealings over the years,
from the cocaine-running at Mena Airport to the rapes by Bill Clinton
of children younger than the age of consent), and numerous others
either too obscure to mention or too unknown to connect directly with
motive to the Clintons' ambitions.
Simply
put, stealing an election, a nomination, is one of the most heinous
and evil acts anyone can engage in, from the minions flipping the
machines and purging voting rolls to the candidate him-or-herself.
Essentially it is attempting to take from the People, the public, the
person they are voting to give their power to, to act in their
interests. By definition, anyone trying to take that away from them
is NOT acting in their interests – they are instead working for
their OWN interests, to which they feel they can subordinate the
public's interest. The hunger for control can be such that money and
power can be used to bribe those that are involved in such theft, and
is but one more example of the axiom “power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely”. It is NOT ENOUGH to simply brush aside
such claims and evidence with the typical shouder-shrugging and
hand-wringing that “all politicians do it, so why bother
complaining”. FULL STOP. NO! There should be NO going forward
until punishment is meted out for such theft, and in order to punish
the offenders, evidence must be put forward and arrests made.
Perpetrators should be rounded up, charged and punishments ordered
from on high.
Has
anything of the sort occurred? Apparently not; Hillary Clinton is
like the evil step-sister who stole the glass slipper from
Cinderella, such is her greediness for power. We don't know how she
can sleep at night, knowing that she was not the choice of the
majority of Democrats. Perhaps it has something to do with the fact
that the six major media conglomerates that control practically all
of the media consumed by the average naive citizen have refused to
even acknowledge this electoral fraud. Instead they avoid it
altogether and act as if she gained the nomination legitimately.
Even
the corporate shill we call our current president was in on the
fraud, as most of us who merely observed watched in horror as the
theft occurred with nary an outcry from either the corporate media or
the law-enforcement organizations, despite the many hours of video
footage showing the fraud taking place as well as the exit polls
(which were later 'adjusted' to match the recorded totals, so as not
to alarm the ignorant public that there was such a wide discrepancy
in many states that it would have triggered claims of FRAUD if those
primaries had occurred overseas under UN monitoring).
NOTHING WAS
DONE, so is it any wonder the naive and clueless among us think
little of it? We were brought up to believe that the people on TV and
in the newspapers were good people and interested in bringing the
news to us, but only those well on the way to their 'Awakening'
realize how much of an illusion that is.
Few people understand the
role the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) has played in our Western
belief system since its founding in 1913. From the very
beginning,
the CFR's mission has been to mold public opinion by placing “senior
editors” [i.e. censors] in the newsrooms of the broadcast networks
and newspapers, to insure that nothing gets into the public
consciousness that could threaten either profits or the orderly
operations of their corporations and business interests. Yes, there
are other groups that are involved in this effort, but I single out
the CFR because Hillary can easily be seen in a well-known video clip
standing at the podium of the CFR early on in her career as Secretary
of State describing how glad she is that she doesn't have to go all
the way to the “mothership in New York” to “be told what she
should be doing and how we should think about the future” now that
there is a CFR 'outpost' on Capitol Hill. For those who have a hard
time taking this claim seriously, you can watch her say those exact
words, live at the CFR itself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfpgl6NqF0I
The
point is clear: The organs of the US government take their marching
orders from non-governmental bodies such as the CFR, as does the
corporate media. The candidates and mainstream media are beholden to
these shadowy powers (does anyone really believe that all the
hedge-fund banks and financial institutions aren't expecting
something in return for their huuuge donations?!?), and when it
becomes clear – as it did today, if not before – that their
preferred candidate is teetering on her last legs health-wise
(literally!), what will they do? Do they think they can convince the
anti-Establishment Trump that they can now work with him? Not
likely, as Trump's main agenda is to take down the Bush-Clinton crime
cabal and restore a sense of American pride in the large swaths of
the population that have suffered the indignities bestowed on them by
the elites, who show their condescension of their fellow Americans
outside the major globalist centers by categorizing them as a “basket
of deplorables”. (That was Hillary's recent comment, one which she apologized
for 17 hours later since it went viral as this election's version of
Romney's “47% of Americans are takers, not makers”).
My
well-meaning but naive fellow progressives who vainly continue to
maintain support for the corrupt and fraudulent Hillary are probably
unaware of how dangerous as well as evil (YES, let's use the word:
EVIL) this female candidate is. Perhaps the paleo-feminists such as
Madeleine Albright continue to support her because they are permanently wedded to the
concept of the “first female president”, without concern for
whether she be qualified or not, but being purposefully blinded is
the same as being willfully malevolent, and this “first female
major-party candidate” should be gently taken into custody and upon
trial and conviction by her peers, be arranged to be horse-whipped
coast-to-coast. Actually that would be too cruel, and death would be
too kind, so I would modify the punishment: no horse-whips, but the
type of school paddle that was used in the classrooms of the 1930s
through the 1970s. Every citizen could – upon payment of a small
token fee to help defray the costs of hauling her carcass around from
town to town, coast-to-coast – have a whack at her behind to help
assuage their anger and misery.
Democrats,
REAL Democrats, who believe in equality and fairness for all, do not
steal elections – to do such a thing bespeaks an elitism far beyond
even Republicanism. Only someone who thinks they are better equipped
than anyone else claiming to fulfill the “will of the People”
would even dare try to steal an election.
The
Democratic Party is in a state of deep-freeze; one day, finally rid
of the corruption, venality and fraudulence of the Clintons and their
minions, it will hopefully rise again. First, the interlopers and
their cohorts must be scrubbed from the ranks of the party, and it
will probably take a concerted effort on the part of a Pres. Trump
and his Democratic allies to do so. The fate of the Party should not
hinge on the temporary criminality of one crime family.
Another
reason why intelligent Democrats should make common cause with Donald
Trump is because this is not an election between “conservative”
and “liberal”, or “right” vs “left” - this is between the
globalist Establishment (a/k/a 'New World Order') and the American
people, much as the Brexit vote was a blow against the globalists by
the British people.
The
primary goal of globalism is to commodify all labor, to reduce every
human to the status of a consumer and labor-unit. To do this, it
scorns all forms of populism and nationalism as the last vestiges of
a racist, sexist, misogynistic society that needs to be cowed into
submission by secretive efforts to divide and conquer, using the very
claims of racism and sexism to do so. By funding divisive movements
such as Black Lives Matter, as Hillary Clinton's primary benefactor
George Soros does, they hope to pit the races against each other and
keep them at each others' throats – instead of uniting them in
expressions of nationalistic unity that would impede the globalist
goal of a single world-wide police state of consumers and
labor-units. It's well-known that “all lives matter”, but by
emphasizing the racial aspect of police brutality instead of the
brutality aspect of excessive and punitive law-enforcement, it
continues to subtly push the idea that the enemy is overly-armed,
overly-aggressive white males....which is not borne out in the rest
of popular culture.
Instead,
the white male – who is no longer the privileged human that
previously did all the bread-winning for the typical American family
– has been left with few employment options outside of fast-food
service or the medical field (aside from the few who achieve enough
academic success to snag one of the few jobs in education,
engineering, or Silicon Valley). Furthermore, the white male is
continuously portrayed in popular culture as either lazy, stupid,
nerdy or all three. Take a look at virtually any commercial which
includes a white male; this is NOT your father's culture. Even rock
n' roll is no longer a dream career for young white males – as with
sports, most role models in music are now non-white, and there are as
many if not more female pop music stars than male. In almost every
category of human endeavor, females are now just as prevalent – as
they should be. Non-whites are even more prevalent in music, and most
white males who look to make a career in it seem to gravitate to
what's still known as “country”, which has adopted the
accouterments of rock n' roll, but with none of the revolutionary
fervor that threatens globalism.
Trump
harkens not to “white supremacy”, but he does offer the antidote
to the “identity politics” that has degraded the hopes and dreams
of many Americans. “Identity politics” pushes the idea that all
those who had been subordinate to a majority that were white (by
happenstance of birth rate and immigration laws) and predominantly
male (by cultural heritage in which the male worked while the female
stayed home and raised the children) should “stand up” for their
particular demographic niche, usually in a resistant or even hostile
manner. Hillary Clinton has now been revealed, in correspondence
with the well-known Sixties radical Saul Alinsky, to have a
deep-seated belief in the need for social reformers to “agitate”,
for the divisions in society to be “rubbed raw”. As a one-time
adherent of radical politics in the generation immediately following
hers, I know of this trait, and I have abhorred it. It's but another
example of “divide and conquer”, and considered in light of the
immense corruption Hillary has been involved throughout her adult
life as First Lady and US senator, as well as Secretary of State, it
should ring loud alarm bells in any intelligent civic-minded
American. Few people, whether Democratic, Republican, Socialist or
Libertarian, can feel confident that anything she says can be
believed, as her tendency to lie is well-known. This would account
for how few people show up to hear or see her speak, as the
conviction necessary to rally large crowds is missing. She can't
deliver it because she doesn't have it. She can copy others, as she
usually does, and when down or cornered pull out the paleo-feminist
claim that it's all due to “men”, but the truth is she is known
to be running for President not because she has passionate ideals she
wants to implement to raise the standard of living and happiness of
Americans, she's doing it all for herself. It's all about her, and
it shows.
Trump,
as the recent Hillary comment about “basket of deplorables”
shows, is rallying Americans of all colors, all ages, all stripes,
against the perceived failure of the elites to do anything to raise
the “contentment” index. While Hillary may like to think her
efforts to demonize him by equating his raw bellicosity with all the
evils that used to bedevil white males, it simply doesn't stick
outside the few urban islands filled with highly intelligent (but
relatively unaware and naive) professionals that look down
condescendingly on those who live in the vast hinterlands of the
continent. Did Trump say some shocking things? Yes, and early on I
saw the political acumen he employed in how and why he did it –
they alienated those that insist on fighting political battles on
traditional issues in a milquetoast manner, while attracting to his side the many alienated
“low information voters” that had been ignored in recent years but certainly know their lives have lost opportunities, not gained.
To compare his “politically incorrect” statements to the known
crimes of Hillary is no comparison.
Let's use one example, one that
will show how Hillary's much-vaunted “experience” is actually a
negative and should be known about but is rarely discussed.
This
example comes to us courtesy of the Benghazi hearings along with the
leaked emails that resulted from it. While most people know that the
US ambassador to Libya was killed in an attack on the Benghazi
“annex”, few know the circumstances. Some of us have even come
to believe that it was one more milestone in the Clintons' trail of
murders, this one to silence a potential critic (Ambassador
Christopher Stevens) who was about to blow the whistle on the
criminal arms-trading that his boss Hillary had been engaged in,
shipping arms to Syria through Libya, but we'll put aside that
explosive contention for the moment and focus solely on the decisions
that left the Benghazi annex defenseless. It's come to light that
embassy personnel had repeatedly requested additional security
personnel, and had not only been denied it, but had been ordered to
remove the one piece of defensive fire-power they had positioned –
a machine gun near the entrance to the facility.
According to
Hillary and the minions she passed the orders down through, even the
sight of this machine gun, with its belts of ammunition, would be
enough to upset the Libyan hosts, and should be removed in order to
show that the Americans meant no harm. And when Ambassador Stevens
requested additional personnel, Marines that are used to protect
embassies (the Benghazi complex was an “annex”, not the actual
embassy) were also seen as “too provocative”, so the ambassador's
request was denied. Even after the attack had begun, security
personnel were not sent, not immediately any way, and any reasonable
researcher who delves into what happened can only come away with
either of two conclusions: the elements of the US Sate Dept and
Defense Dept (the carrier group that eventually responded) were
either grossly stupid and naive, the type of bumbling government
servants whose stupidity 'allowed' such events as 9/11, or there was
an intentional murder of an American ambassador who knew too much.
The
above example is but one reason why intelligent Democrats shoujld
recognize that Trump's charge Hillary has extremely poor judgement
goes beyond the usual reference to her disasterous vote in support of
the Iraq war. She would like to put that behind her with the typical
“I made a mistake, I'm sorry, I won't do it again”, but she did.
Her actions in Libya (her premature gloating revealed in the emails'
references to 'tick tock' show that she was just as arrogant about
Libya as Bush Jr was about Iraq) show this. Experience does NOT
equal judgement, and her consistent warmongering and coziness with
arms dealers, foreign donors and governments shows this.
One
last reason for why intelligent Democrats should take this
opportunity to vote for the Republican this one time is also
important: Donald Trump has not made the usual inflammatory comments
that demonize the core values most Democrats hold, or even Democrats
themselves (he's appealing to the many Bernie supporters that are
livid from the outright theft of the nomination, and....it's
working). Actually this is one reason Establishment Republicans are
just as scared of him as Establishment Democrats: they stand to lose
if Trump is elected and begins to carry out his mandate. When the
People win, the elites will – by definition this time – lose.
That's not always the case, but the Establishment elites have been
slowly degrading the People for a long time, both Democrats and
Republicans, particularly the Bush-Clinton crime cabal (which is
extensively documented, but this is not the place to go into those
details).
In
fact, many core values that make us all Americans transcend the
current political philosophies of either party, and can be found in
the one Founding Father both parties call their own – Thomas
Jefferson. Our biggest enemy isn't necessarily a foreign country, it
is the central bankers Jefferson warned us about. Trump knows this,
and allegedly is supported by the most powerful Rothschild of all
(one who is not known to the public; the Nate and Jacob Rothschilds
that many in the truth-seeking community like to think are the main
Rothschilds are simply regular billionaires, not the quadrillionaire
that sits atop the main pile, though he sits alone among the bankers
in his attempts to help prepare Earth for what's coming). He is
appealing to those that want to feel part of the egalitarian American
community that even Millenials are taught at school, though they may
not have to take civics courses any more.
Smug
sociologists will be stunned by the demographics of the Trump
electorate, once it's allowed to be shown: large numbers of
intelligent African-Americans will defect to Trump's side in response
to a genuine appeal to them as equals in the great American
Experiment, and the same will happen with members of the LBGT
community. If anyone questions that, let them watch his acceptance
speech at the GOP nominating convention – even I was shocked to
hear how heart-felt his comment was about how glad it made him feel
to hear the level of applause to his appeal to the LBGT community,
particularly because of the GOP's previous record with that
community's issues.
Finally,
there is the insistent push on the part of the corrupt Republicrat
party apparatus backing Hillary to demonize the Russian leader,
Vladimir Putin, particularly because he made a complimentary
statement about Trump in public. To them, this is akin to some form
of Unamericanism on the part of Trump. First, how can it be said
that Trump is somehow guilty of being “unpatriotic” because a
foreign leader said something nice about him? Did Trump say
something nice about Putin? Did he say something incorrect is the
proper question. Trump acknowledged what most of us know but are
afraid to say: Vladimir Putin is more respected among his people (an
82% approval rating at last count, by Gallup if memory serves) than
Obama is among Americans (less than 47% at last count, by Gallup once
again). Sad – but TRUE. Putin is often accused of crimes that few
Americans realize are conducted by all world leaders, particularly
their own – Obama. Does he do anything that corporate America
doesn't do? Well, we can look at the RT television and radio
network, to which many well-known American celebrities have flocked
to along with huge swaths of the US viewing audience (don't believe
me? Witness Hillary's and John Kerry's public comments about them,
how they're “winning the TV wars”, how “we need something like
that here”.....hey guys, why not just tell CNN and FOX to start
telling the truth for once and cover such things as the rampant
election fraud?!?).
One
such TV host who now has a show on RT, Larry King, interviewed Trump
a few nights ago, and this interview was dissected line by line on US
corporate media, with talking heads on CNN, Fox, and MSNBC all
claiming it proved Trump was being “unamerican” and “pro-Putin”.
What balderdash! How insulting! Trump reiterated how he didn't
know whether Russia was involved in the hacking of Hillary's and the
DNC's emails, but does it even matter when Julian Assange of
Wikileaks has practically admitted that it was Seth Rich, a DNC
employee who blew the whistle and leaked directly to Wikileaks when
he saw the evil and criminal actions Hillary and her minions were
engaged in? Seth Rich was gunned down at 4:19am on the morning of
July 11th
near his home in Washington DC by gunmen who had allegedly lured him
there posing as FBI agents that would take his statements regarding
the pay-to-play scheme the Clinton Foundation was engaged in. While
some have tried to suggest it was merely a robbery, intelligent and
critical thinkers who read further that nothing of value was taken
from his body can conclude that the murder was both in retaliation
for the leaking of the emails and to prevent his testimony from
exposing Clinton collusion and corruption. The fact that many of my
friends who are otherwise intelligent and well-meaning avoid all
these ugly connections and connected dots is both stunning and
alarming to me, because they have been hypnotized into thinking that
Big Ole Meany Donald Trump said some Mean Things, and just as bad,
Bad Guys like David Duke like him. What they fail to see is that
Hillary has her fair share of KKK donors (one group of KKK police
officers donated $20,000 to her last presidentail campaign, and as
the officer chillingly described, they have every reason to believe
she hasn't changed since), and not only white-supremacists support
her but black racists support her. For that matter, a Black Panther
group has now endorsed Trump, so where does a voter draw the line?
Does it matter which candidate racists of any color support? I
personally think black racism is now more prevalent than white
racism, in 2016, and for that matter most racism is bent not only on
doing damage to the other color, but in asserting identity. Trump
represents a diverse, vibrant, colorful society of Americans, one
that subordinates color and race to being an American first. The
first and most important issue for all Americans is what it's always
been: jobs, jobs, & jobs. Hillary stands with an incumbent who
admittedly had to dig our way out of a deep, deep hole dug by his
predecessor, and history may be kinder to his efforts to do that, but
at present he is lauding a trade deal that would give corporate
courts more power than sovereign states currently have, and flush
even more jobs out of the country to Third World nations that are
happy to perform the labor for pennies on the dollar.....a dollar
which itself is precariously hanging on a thread and is destined
shortly to be converted back to a gold-backed currency that has
nothing to do with the criminal private enterprise known as the
Federal Reserve.
Finally,
the claims about the statements made by Trump early on in his
campaign, the ones that were shown to attract the level of support he
needed to beat 17 accomplished politicians to gain the nomination
(and thus giving rise to the deplorable comment by Hillary recently
about his supporters being a “basked of deplorables”, a “let
them eat cake” comment if there ever was one), can be defended by
any intelligent Democrat. He named “illegal aliens, illegals from
Mexico”, and he was right. To call illegal immigrants “illegal”
is accurate. Speaking as a political refugee that went to Canada to
escape unwarranted surveillance outside my home every day,
surveillance Snowden corroborated, I can speak to this issue with
certainty. People entering the country illegally may have the best
of intentions, but no matter how hard their claims pull
heart-strings, they are here in America illegally and should face the
consequences of breaking the law. Trump says what most Americans
feel is at the root of their anger: there has been no accountability,
and he promises to bring it.
It doesn't matter that Obama has
deported more illegal aliens than any of his predecessors – there are
still many millions here illegally, and because a wall that can
secure the border was never built, the problem continues day by day.
Those that argue, like candidate Gary Johnson, there is no such thing
as an “illegal alien”, who argue for an “open border”, are
globalists that aspire to erase national and sovereign borders so
that all labor world-wide will be dictated by the price at which
desperate population flows in Third World countries such as
Bangladesh wil do the work, and instead of factories once again
springing up in the US, more will continue to flow out, and America's
crumbling will accelerate, not be stemmed – as Trump and his
supporters hope to do. Manhattan and Silicon Valley may continue to
float in a sea of increasing ruin, but eventually even the smug
inhabitants there will realize what folly globalism has been to the
American way of life, and fewer and fewer will be able to afford
their $5 lattes and $10 burritos any more. The “middle class”
will be but a shadow of its former self, subordinate to the elite's
dictums to manipulate the lower classes to accept their lot without
complaint.
This
is the state of affairs that Trump hopes to avoid, and if he's
bellicose about it, it doesn't mean he's a sexist and misogynist –
most women can easily see that he can be a boor at times but is
respectful towards women that show him respect, just as he treats
everyone that way. We may yearn for an FDR, but we can settle for a
Napoleon. A subtle put-down directly to his face may result in an
ugly outburst, but if accorded common decency, Trump is a decent man
– not a racist, not a sexist, and not even a religious bigot. He
never decried legal immigrants, he decried ILLEGAL immigrants who
broke the law. How hard is that to accept? He never decried all
muslims, he simply acknowledged what is now self-evident: the US,
like Europe, is beginning to experience random acts of terror carried
out by radical muslims, who believe in a version of Islam that
justifies acts of violents against kafirs, or non-believers. Trump
says that we should put a hold on allowing any new muslim immigrants
into the country “until we figure out what's going on”. As a
method of self-preservation, that's what intelligent leaders SHOULD
call for. When a destructive trend shows itself, steps should be
taken to get a grip on the situation and then to address it.
For
example: anyone who studies the history of Islam should look at the
history of that religion; it is NOT but a different sect that wants
to merely practice its belief in peace, it is literally a belief
system alien to everything in American history and cultural life.
Yes, there are moderate versions of Islam that have concluded that
the elements in the Islamic holy book the Quran that lay out Sharia
law, that regulate how muslims should live with “non-believers”
(or 'kafirs') are archaic and must be vocally condemned by those
using the same book as their guide in other matters, but the religion
itself is based on conquering not only non-believers but elements
within the self – that jihad, or struggle, comes down to the
individual's struggle. For an unorthodox understanding of Islam that
will be helpful in the coming days, I recommend Dr. Bill Warner and
his website, http://www.politcalislam.com
. Dr. Warner has studied Islam for many years and has a healthy
respect for it, but this is what he says about it:
It is frequently said that moderate Muslims can solve the problem of jihad and terror. Everyone has met nice Muslims, some of whom are willing to admit that Islam has problems and may even say that Islamic State is bad. Moderate Muslims are nice people who come to interfaith events, interviews and talks at schools and churches. Moderate Muslims even tell us that they are the real victim, not the Kafir.
Here is the problem—Islam cannot be changed by anybody, moderate or not. Islam is the civilizational doctrine found in the Koran, Sira and Hadith. Nobody can change the Sunna and the Koran. Their words are eternal, perfect and universal. Nobody can change Islam. It is fixed and frozen by its unalterable doctrine.
What we call moderation is simply ignoring the violence and hate. But the jihad cannot be removed, it can only be denied by ignoring it. A moderate has the same Allah and Mohammed that a jihadist has.
Moderate Islam is Islam light, Islam ignored. Islam changes Muslims; Muslims can only choose not to practice the dark side of Islam, but they cannot change it or get rid of it. Islamic doctrine is fixed, eternal, unchangeable and forever.
You
may disagree with his view, but his facts are correct. He further
goes on to state the fact that the most persecuted religious group in
the world today are the Christians. The Golden Rule is under attack
by practically every other religious group, and while it is true that
the rulers of the state of Israel have persecuted the Palestinians
among them for decades, it isn't the average Israeli citizen that has
done so, the rulers that have stolen elections – such as the
current fraud, Netanyahu – have committed many crimes against both
Christian and Muslim Palestinians. Many would even say that the
ultra-zionists behind the attempt to 'settle' Palestinian areas of
the West Bank, and also behind the false-flag evil act of 9/11, are
the most heinous and evil religious group of all – fomenting hatred
of Christians by causing false-flag events that pin the evil on mad
muslims.
Well, now it's a reality, one that can be reasonably argued
we created or at least awakened, and Trump wants to “get to the
bottom of it”. Many of us can only pray that if he is elected that
he carry out that effort faithfully, and will report on it
faithfully; he was initially booed at the AIPAC convention because of
his comments promising fairness as well as his love for Israel.
Wait, what?!? Yes; it was his claim to be fair to the Palestinians
that alienated him from that audience, because they aren't interested
in being 'fair', they are interested in re-making Israel “whole”,
as in one state; no “two-state solution” for them. Everyone
liked his passionate love of Israel, but any mention of being “fair”
to the Palestinians.....well, that brought a big round of boos.
Ponder that.
A word now about the use of the term "alt", as Hillary has been using it of late to describe non-corporate media. She claims the "alt-media", the "alt-right" (translation: The Drudge Report, Alex Jones, and various YouTube news personalities who have taken it upon themselves to report their take on the daily news) is "rife with lies" and speaks condescendingly of such sources. It may surprise many that her own best friend Sidney Blumenthal (yes, the same adviser whose online porn habits were so omniscient in the Bill Clinton White House that it caused the chief IT manager to have to de-infest the local network on a daily basis due to all the bugs and viruses he brought in) was the self-professed 'ghostwriter' of a hit piece that purported to be in the vein of the, ahem, "alt-media" but was filled with enough exaggerations to cast aspersions on anyone making any similar claims. In this way, puppets of the corporate media attack the truth-seeking community, who have to constantly sift through piles of fecal material such as Blumenthal would write in his attempts to demean any media or message outside the CFR-controlled corporate media's message.
One
last word about Hillary's minions' attempts to blame Russia for
hacking her emails and for allegedly supporting her opponent. (We can
suspect that Russia probably had hacked her private server ages ago, but has been clever enough
to keep quiet about it.....critical thinkers will pick up on her hypocrisy.) Why is it that she doesn't want to work with Russia as an
equal on the world stage, getting rid of ISIS (a terror group that
she assisted in creating); was it she that arranged for them to
purchase all that American military equipment? What about all those
white Toyotas they drive around in, and those ski masks? While many
in the West are very uncomfortable with the Russian law that
criminalized “homosexual propaganda”, it is still a democracy, it
is still trying to remove the ill effects of having a handful of
oligarchs (who had been Communists in charge of government
enterprises, emboldened and empowered by American black-ops arranging
for allies post-breakup of the Soviet Union) corrupt public life.
Yes, Putin has been aggressive in rebuilding his peoples' self-image,
as he rightly should; he's no FDR, but did we expect him to be? He
doesn't censor any of the American anchors on his RT network, not one
iota, and now Jesse Ventura is joining his lineup, as Larry King and
Ed Schultz (formerly of MSNBC, as progressive readers know) have
already. Is he a 'bad guy'? What gives Hillary cause to blame him
and Russia for hacking her email? Is it any worse than what she did
to hide her emails from US govt and FOIA oversight? The hypocrisy is
simply stunning....we now know, as I said earlier, that it was Seth
Rich who hacked the DNC, and others have since claimed they were the
hackers. Putin has been careful not to intervene in our election,
but he's done nothing worse than our own corporate government has
done. Prove me wrong if you doubt that! Meanwhile, our own US
corporate media will hawk that line, but once again – critical
thinking skills will help real truth-seekers. Our own govt is worse
than most banana republics, having used the CIA to involve US
corporate interests in upending and overturning many
will-of-the-People elections and as said before, we can only pray
that a President Trump will not only find this out, but make the
facts public.
The
stakes are very high this election, as they always are, and while I
doubt anyone will succeed Obama/General Dunford in the Ofal Office on
January 20th, 2017, we have to act as if life will go on,
as the “last weeks” continue to be delayed.
